Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pkg/controller/statusmanager: Link docs.redhat.com #2512

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-4.16
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wking
Copy link
Member

@wking wking commented Sep 26, 2024

docs.openshift.com is being folded into docs.redhat.com. There will hopefully be a redirect system that takes folks from an old-location page straight to the new-location page. But 4.16 has support through 2027-06-27, so point straight at the new location, which protects us against buggy or imprecise redirect implementations (e.g. we don't want customers dropped into the top-level 4.16 welcome page, or anything like that). This patch will obviously only affect new 4.16.z releases; older 4.16.z will still point at docs.openshift.com, and will rely on the redirects or the tenacity of the cluster admin to work around a buggy or imprecise redirect. And if redirects end up being great, we won't have needed this code change. But with the redirect system currently untestable, it seems better to be cautious and avoid it as much as we can.

docs.openshift.com is being folded into docs.redhat.com.  There will
hopefully be a redirect system that takes folks from an old-location
page straight to the new-location page.  But 4.16 has support through
2027-06-27 [1], so point straight at the new location, which protects
us against buggy or imprecise redirect implementations (e.g. we don't
want customers dropped into the top-level 4.16 welcome page, or
anything like that).  This patch will obviously only affect new 4.16.z
releases; older 4.16.z will still point at docs.openshift.com, and
will rely on the redirects or the tenacity of the cluster admin to
work around a buggy or imprecise redirect.  And if redirects end up
being great, we won't have needed this code change.  But with the
redirect system currently untestable, it seems better to be cautious
and avoid it as much as we can.

[1]: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/openshift#dates
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from abhat and danwinship September 26, 2024 18:48
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 26, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wking
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign danwinship for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@wking wking force-pushed the docs.redhat.com-sdn-migration-uri branch from 1530993 to 6c694eb Compare September 26, 2024 18:48
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 26, 2024

@wking: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6 6c694eb link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6
ci/prow/security 6c694eb link false /test security
ci/prow/e2e-aws-hypershift-ovn-kubevirt 6c694eb link false /test e2e-aws-hypershift-ovn-kubevirt
ci/prow/4.16-upgrade-from-stable-4.15-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade 6c694eb link false /test 4.16-upgrade-from-stable-4.15-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ func (status *StatusManager) set(reachedAvailableLevel bool, conditions ...operv
Reason: "OpenShiftSDNConfigured",
Message: "Cluster is configured with OpenShiftSDN, which is not supported in the next version. Please " +
"follow the documented steps to migrate from OpenShiftSDN to OVN-Kubernetes in order to be able to upgrade. " +
"https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.16/networking/ovn_kubernetes_network_provider/migrate-from-openshift-sdn.html",
"https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/openshift_container_platform/4.16/html/networking/ovn-kubernetes-network-plugin",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants