Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(btc): implement new btc rpc package #3349

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

swift1337
Copy link
Contributor

@swift1337 swift1337 commented Jan 13, 2025

This PR implements Bitcoin client in Go-"native" way

  • It leverages existing btcsuite types, but removes all redundant features such as websockets or backward compatibility with old BTC versions that are not used anymore
  • It ensures ctx for each call
  • The over-complicated chan-based design is replaced with a simple "stateless" request-response approach
  • It also fixed a significant drawback of the original RPC: lack of ctx might block execution indefinitely & block other routines (see this and this)

  • Implement BTC Client
  • Port methods from zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc
  • Implement prometheus metrics
  • Port live tests
  • Replace usage zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc & interfaces.BTCRPCClient with the new client
  • Fix unit tests
  • Fix e2e tests

One of examples

Before

// zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc.go
func GetTxResultByHash(
	rpcClient interfaces.BTCRPCClient,
	txID string,
) (*chainhash.Hash, *btcjson.GetTransactionResult, error) {
	hash, err := chainhash.NewHashFromStr(txID)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, nil, errors.Wrapf(err, "GetTxResultByHash: error NewHashFromStr: %s", txID)
	}

	// The Bitcoin node has to be configured to watch TSS address
	txResult, err := rpcClient.GetTransaction(hash)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, nil, errors.Wrapf(err, "GetTxResultByHash: error GetTransaction %s", hash.String())
	}
	return hash, txResult, nil
}

After

tx, err := btcClient.GetTransaction(ctx, txHash)

// or

tx, err := btcClient.GetTransactionByStr(ctx, "my-string-hash")

Related:

@swift1337 swift1337 self-assigned this Jan 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2025

!!!WARNING!!!
nosec detected in the following files: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/client/client_test.go, zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/client/helpers.go

Be very careful about using #nosec in code. It can be a quick way to suppress security warnings and move forward with development, it should be employed with caution. Suppressing warnings with #nosec can hide potentially serious vulnerabilities. Only use #nosec when you're absolutely certain that the security issue is either a false positive or has been mitigated in another way.

Only suppress a single rule (or a specific set of rules) within a section of code, while continuing to scan for other problems. To do this, you can list the rule(s) to be suppressed within the #nosec annotation, e.g: /* #nosec G401 */ or //#nosec G201 G202 G203
Broad #nosec annotations should be avoided, as they can hide other vulnerabilities. The CI will block you from merging this PR until you remove #nosec annotations that do not target specific rules.

Pay extra attention to the way #nosec is being used in the files listed above.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the nosec label Jan 13, 2025
@swift1337 swift1337 added chain:bitcoin Bitcoin chain related improvement and removed nosec labels Jan 13, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 446 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 61.56%. Comparing base (8ce300b) to head (2375ca9).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/client/commands.go 0.00% 194 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/client/client.go 0.00% 135 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/client/helpers.go 0.00% 117 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3349      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    62.43%   61.56%   -0.88%     
===========================================
  Files          449      452       +3     
  Lines        31710    32152     +442     
===========================================
- Hits         19799    19795       -4     
- Misses       11024    11470     +446     
  Partials       887      887              
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
zetaclient/metrics/metrics.go 69.64% <ø> (ø)
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/client/helpers.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/client/client.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/client/commands.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@github-actions github-actions bot added the nosec label Jan 14, 2025
Copy link
Member

@gartnera gartnera left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally LGTM.

If you directly copy pasted something from btcd please make sure to notate the original license on the file.

Comment on lines +134 to +137
res, err := c.client.Do(req)
if err != nil {
return rawResponse{}, errors.Wrap(err, "unable to send the request")
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there should be a response code is 200 check here too?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants