Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ansible update aggregator #1596

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: testnet
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

samoht9277
Copy link
Collaborator

@samoht9277 samoht9277 commented Dec 9, 2024

Ansible for re-deploying Aggregator component

Description

This PR adds a the capability of re-deploying a server, and upgrading the Aggregator version.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • Optimization
  • Refactor

Checklist

  • “Hotfix” to testnet, everything else to staging
  • Linked to Github Issue
  • This change depends on code or research by an external entity
    • Acknowledgements were updated to give credit
  • Unit tests added
  • This change requires new documentation.
    • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • This change is an Optimization
    • Benchmarks added/run
  • Has a known issue
  • If your PR changes the Operator compatibility (Ex: Upgrade prover versions)
    • This PR adds compatibility for operator for both versions and do not change batcher/docs/examples
    • This PR updates batcher and docs/examples to the newer version. This requires the operator are already updated to be compatible

@samoht9277 samoht9277 marked this pull request as draft December 9, 2024 21:11
@samoht9277 samoht9277 force-pushed the ansible_update_aggregator branch from c226382 to 24b04f8 Compare December 9, 2024 21:14
@samoht9277 samoht9277 force-pushed the ansible_update_aggregator branch 2 times, most recently from 5abdf34 to 428d4dc Compare December 9, 2024 21:17
@samoht9277 samoht9277 self-assigned this Dec 10, 2024
@samoht9277 samoht9277 marked this pull request as ready for review January 3, 2025 14:36
@samoht9277 samoht9277 requested review from JuArce and klaus993 January 3, 2025 14:36
@Oppen
Copy link
Collaborator

Oppen commented Jan 9, 2025

Seems correct. I wonder if we need the abstraction on ansible_user (is that a sensible thing to customize?) and the Go compiler in the machine tho.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants