Enable multilib support #8
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi All,
This feedstock is mainly for providing precompiled riscv toolchain for Chipyard. Since there are RV32 cores supported by Chipyard(RocketChip has RV32 configuration and the educational SODAR core), I wonder if riscv toolchain provided by the default chipyard configuration could provide multilib support so that some of the evaluation design could be compiled successfully without using some extra toolchains(from sifive or others). But according to ucb-bar/chipyard#372, seems that enabling multilib just by appending
--enable-multilibin the configure will break some libraries. I don't know if this is true for the current chipyard software stack. Therefore I filed this PR mainly for requesting a chipyard riscv toolchain for both RV32 and RV64 support. If the multilib support is not reasonable, is there some other mechanism to make this happen?Thanks!