adding a new plate purpose for multiplexed sequencing submissions, to avoid FC

[sabrine33]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.76%. Comparing base (3dbdbf0) to head (e2b80c7).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2120   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    80.76%   80.76%           
========================================
  Files          477      477           
  Lines        18148    18148           
  Branches       269      269           
========================================
  Hits         14658    14658           
  Misses        3488     3488           
  Partials         2        2           

Flag	Coverage Δ
javascript	74.23% <ø> (ø)
pull_request	80.76% <100.00%> (ø)
push	80.76% <100.00%> (ø)
ruby	91.28% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[dasunpubudumal]

Is there a integration suite update for this?

[sabrine33]

Is there a integration suite update for this?

good point, I will try to add some

[KatyTaylor]

Hey, how did you decide which pipeline files to add this into? Thanks

[sabrine33]

Hey, how did you decide which pipeline files to add this into? Thanks

I basically checked the ones used by LB-Lib-PCR-XP, as from the story they are doing a FC to create a LB-Lib-PCR-XP and then perform the multiplexing - it might be more generic way of doing it through

[KatyTaylor]

I basically checked the ones used by LB-Lib-PCR-XP, as from the story they are doing a FC to create a LB-Lib-PCR-XP and then perform the multiplexing - it might be more generic way of doing it through

OK yep. Could be worth telling the customer which pipelines you've added it too, and checking that it's relevant to all of them.

Wondering particularly about ISC because it comes in half way and it's not just doing multiplexing - there's bait capture hybridization (or something) happening.

[sabrine33]

I basically checked the ones used by LB-Lib-PCR-XP, as from the story they are doing a FC to create a LB-Lib-PCR-XP and then perform the multiplexing - it might be more generic way of doing it through

OK yep. Could be worth telling the customer which pipelines you've added it too, and checking that it's relevant to all of them.

Wondering particularly about ISC because it comes in half way and it's not just doing multiplexing - there's bait capture hybridization (or something) happening.

Thank you, I will do, do we have a slack channel for this ? I know Liz and Siobhan are the key persons to ask..

[KatyTaylor]

Needed because when the multiplexing pipeline starts with a stock plate (rather than a cherrypick plate, or one coming from a library prep pipeline), the wells are of state 'unknown'