3.1.0 #123
3.1.0 #123
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Nek-12 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 57 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive set of changes across multiple files in the FlowMVI project, focusing on workflow configurations, documentation updates, dependency version upgrades, and UI layout improvements. The modifications span GitHub Actions workflows, build configurations, sample application screens, and core library components. Key areas of change include stricter error handling in workflows, updating dependency versions, enhancing UI layout constraints, and refining state management strategies. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Workflow as GitHub Actions
participant Docs as Documentation Generation
participant Publish as Release Process
Workflow->>Docs: Generate documentation
activate Docs
Docs-->>Workflow: Documentation generated
deactivate Docs
Workflow->>Publish: Prepare release
activate Publish
Publish->>Publish: Generate changelog
Publish->>Publish: Create GitHub release
Publish-->>Workflow: Release completed
deactivate Publish
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
README.md (1)
408-408: Updated license year
No functional impact, but do confirm consistency across other legal or licensing references in your repository.docs/quickstart.md (1)
346-355: Revised stateStrategy usage
Replacing atomicStateUpdates with stateStrategy clarifies the concurrency approach. The new strategic options (Immediate, Atomic, etc.) offer more control. Make sure your team is informed about the performance and thread-safety tradeoffs of the chosen strategy.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
347-347: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
351-351: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
354-354: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
docs/CONTRIBUTING.md (1)
15-15: Fix markdown list indentation.The unordered list item has incorrect indentation (4 spaces instead of 2).
- * Android Studio latest Stable or Beta, depending on the current project's AGP. + * Android Studio latest Stable or Beta, depending on the current project's AGP.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
15-15: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
.github/workflows/docs.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/publish.yml(0 hunks).idea/AndroidProjectSystem.xml(1 hunks)README.md(4 hunks)buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/Config.kt(1 hunks)core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/dsl/StoreDsl.kt(0 hunks)core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/test/store/NestedRecoverTest.kt(1 hunks)core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/test/store/StoreExceptionsTest.kt(3 hunks)debugger/ideplugin/src/main/resources/LiveTemplates.xml(1 hunks)docs/CONTRIBUTING.md(1 hunks)docs/quickstart.md(3 hunks)gradle/libs.versions.toml(3 hunks)gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties(1 hunks)gradlew(1 hunks)metrics/build.gradle.kts(1 hunks)sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/arch/configuration/TestConfigurationFactory.kt(2 hunks)sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/decompose/DecomposeScreen.kt(2 hunks)sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/diconfig/DIConfigScreen.kt(2 hunks)sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/home/HomeScreen.kt(2 hunks)sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/lce/LCEScreen.kt(2 hunks)sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/logging/LoggingScreen.kt(3 hunks)sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/savedstate/SavedStateScreen.kt(2 hunks)sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/simple/SimpleScreen.kt(2 hunks)sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/undoredo/UndoRedoScreen.kt(2 hunks)sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/ui/widgets/CodeView.kt(4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- .github/workflows/docs.yml
- .github/workflows/publish.yml
- core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/dsl/StoreDsl.kt
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties
- metrics/build.gradle.kts
- gradlew
- .idea/AndroidProjectSystem.xml
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/arch/configuration/TestConfigurationFactory.kt (1)
Learnt from: Nek-12
PR: respawn-app/FlowMVI#115
File: core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/api/StoreConfiguration.kt:31-35
Timestamp: 2024-12-08T14:20:26.690Z
Learning: In `StoreConfiguration.kt`, when deprecating properties, if migration guidance and performance implications are already documented in the corresponding strategy code, additional context in the deprecation message is unnecessary.
core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/test/store/StoreExceptionsTest.kt (1)
Learnt from: Nek-12
PR: respawn-app/FlowMVI#112
File: core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/StoreImpl.kt:81-84
Timestamp: 2024-11-28T12:15:12.134Z
Learning: In the FlowMVI project, within `Store` implementations (e.g., in `StoreImpl.kt`), use the custom `catch { }` function defined in `RecoverModule` for exception handling, instead of using standard `try-catch` blocks.
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
docs/quickstart.md
347-347: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation
(MD007, ul-indent)
351-351: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation
(MD007, ul-indent)
354-354: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation
(MD007, ul-indent)
docs/CONTRIBUTING.md
15-15: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation
(MD007, ul-indent)
🔇 Additional comments (46)
sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/simple/SimpleScreen.kt (2)
10-10: Good import addition.
This import for widthIn is consistent with the approach to constrain layout widths.
87-87: Layout width constraint aligns with UI consistency.
The new widthIn(max = 600.dp) ensures the content doesn't stretch too widely. Confirm this still renders well on all target devices.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for similar width constraints in the codebase to verify if this aligns with the project's UI consistency patterns.
Width constraint of 600.dp is consistently used across the application
The widthIn(max = 600.dp) constraint is consistently applied throughout the codebase for content containers, text elements, and input fields. This pattern appears in multiple screens and components:
- Text inputs (
RTextInput.kt) - Menu items (
RMenuItem.kt) - Error views (
RErrorView.kt) - Multiple screen components including
SimpleScreen,UndoRedoScreen,LoggingScreen, and others
The implementation aligns with the established UI consistency patterns in the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for width constraints in Compose UI code
rg "widthIn|width\s*=" -A 2 --type kotlin
Length of output: 14189
sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/diconfig/DIConfigScreen.kt (2)
11-11: Import for layout width constraint recognized.
Introducing the widthIn import aligns with other usage throughout the codebase.
104-104: Applying widthIn to Text.
Confining the text to a maximum width of 600.dp improves readability and maintains visual consistency.
sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/savedstate/SavedStateScreen.kt (2)
12-12: Import for widthIn.
Brings consistency by matching other screens that also constrain UI elements.
104-104: Proposed widthIn for text is a solid improvement.
Limiting the maximum width reduces horizontal scrolling and makes text easier to read.
sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/lce/LCEScreen.kt (3)
11-11: Ensuring layout control with widthIn.
This import is in line with the consistent use of constrained widths across composables.
114-114: Center alignment.
Adding horizontalAlignment = Alignment.CenterHorizontally improves readability in wide layouts.
121-121: Limiting text width to 600.dp.
Prevents overly wide paragraphs and maintains visual consistency across screens.
sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/logging/LoggingScreen.kt (3)
10-10: Nice addition of the widthIn import.
This import is crucial for applying maximum width constraints to composable elements, aligning with the layout consistency changes observed throughout the app.
124-124: Good use of a max width to improve text readability.
Constraining the text component with widthIn(max = 600.dp) helps ensure content remains visually manageable, especially on larger screens.
140-140: Consistent max width application for log entries.
Applying widthIn(max = 600.dp) to the log text items ensures a consistent layout and better readability across different screens.
sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/undoredo/UndoRedoScreen.kt (3)
123-123: Enforcing maximum width for description text.
Using widthIn(max = 600.dp) makes the description remain compact and visually appealing, even on wide displays.
126-126: Flexible row width with minimum and maximum constraints.
widthIn(min = 400.dp, max = 600.dp) enables balanced layout behavior across different screen sizes.
146-146: Limiting the text input’s maximum width.
The RTextInput component is now capped at 600.dp, promoting consistency with other text constraints in the application.
sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/home/HomeScreen.kt (2)
12-12: Importing widthIn for layout constraint adjustments.
This import supports applying a common maximum width across your composables, preserving design consistency.
123-123: Confining project description width.
Using widthIn(max = 400.dp) keeps the text layout neat on broader screens while maintaining padding.
sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/features/decompose/DecomposeScreen.kt (2)
15-15: Introduced widthIn for composable width constraints.
This new import is in line with the pattern of applying maximum width across multiple screens for consistency.
161-161: Adding a 600.dp max width to the description.
This ensures the text remains legible and avoids stretching across very large widths, improving UX.
gradle/libs.versions.toml (4)
2-2: Verify stability of RC/beta versions
The following dependencies are using pre-release versions which may introduce instability:
activity = "1.10.0-rc01"compose = "1.7.3"
Please ensure these versions have been thoroughly tested in your development environment.
Also applies to: 6-6
58-58: Review new benchmark configuration
The addition of benchmark-related dependencies and plugins suggests new performance testing capabilities:
kotlin-benchmark = { module = "org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-benchmark-runtime", version.ref = "kotlin-benchmark" }
...
kotlin-benchmark = { id = "org.jetbrains.kotlinx.benchmark", version.ref = "kotlin-benchmark" }Please ensure:
- The benchmark configuration is properly set up
- Documentation is updated to reflect the new benchmarking capabilities
Also applies to: 149-152
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather information about the benchmark configuration and documentation.
This will help us verify:
- If there are benchmark configuration files
- If there are benchmark-related code files
- If benchmarking is documented in README or other documentation files
Benchmark configuration is properly set up and implemented
The verification shows a well-structured benchmark implementation:
- Complete benchmark module setup in
benchmarks/directory - Proper Gradle configuration with kotlinx-benchmark plugin
- Multiple benchmark implementations covering different scenarios:
- Traditional MVI
- Channel-based MVI
- Atomic FMVI
- Optimized FMVI
- Fluxo benchmarks
The only minor gap is that while the README mentions "regular benchmarking", it could benefit from more detailed documentation about running and interpreting the benchmarks.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for benchmark configuration files and documentation
fd -e gradle -e kt -e md -e properties benchmark
# Look for benchmark-related code
rg -i "benchmark" -g "!{*.lock,*.log}"
# Check README and documentation files for benchmark mentions
fd -e md | xargs rg -i "benchmark"
Length of output: 18659
4-5: Review pinned lifecycle version
The comment indicates this version is pinned to match jb-lifecycle. Please verify if this pinning is still necessary with the latest updates.
Run this script to check version compatibility:
152-152: Verify maven-publish plugin configuration
The maven-publish plugin has been reinstated. Please ensure:
- The publishing configuration is properly set up
- The necessary credentials and repository settings are in place
- The artifact metadata is correctly configured
Run this script to check the publishing configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the maven publish configuration.
Let me try a different search approach to find maven publish configurations.
Let me check the content of the root build.gradle.kts and other key build files.
Based on the build files content, I can now provide a final response:
Maven publish plugin is properly configured
The maven-publish plugin configuration is correctly set up in the root build.gradle.kts with:
- Proper artifact coordinates and version handling
- Complete POM configuration including licenses, developers, and SCM details
- Sonatype Central Portal publishing configuration
- Signing configuration for release builds
- Source and JavaDoc jar configurations
The configuration in local.properties (sonatypeUsername, sonatypePassword, signing.key, signing.password) is also documented in CONTRIBUTING.md for publishers.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for maven publish configuration
rg -l "publishing" | xargs cat
Length of output: 7169
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for maven publish plugin configuration and related settings
rg -l "maven.*publish" --type gradle
Length of output: 187
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for build.gradle files and publishing configurations
fd "build.gradle" -t f
fd "build.gradle.kts" -t f
rg -l "publishing" --type gradle
Length of output: 1297
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of main build files
cat build.gradle.kts
cat buildSrc/build.gradle.kts
Length of output: 6509
sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/arch/configuration/TestConfigurationFactory.kt (2)
8-8: Ensure the import usage aligns with intended strategy migration.
Importing "Immediate" directly is fine. If "Immediate" is a replacement for the previously used atomic flag, verify that any references to the old property are properly removed or deprecated in line with your established migration practices.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for any references to atomic flags and state strategies to verify the migration.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a conclusive response:
The Immediate strategy usage is aligned with the codebase's migration patterns.
The codebase shows clear evidence of a proper migration path from atomic flags to state strategies:
- There's a deprecated
atomicStateUpdatesproperty that explicitly suggests usingStateStrategydirectly - The documentation and implementation show
Immediateas a valid strategy option alongsideAtomic - The test configuration file is using
Immediatestrategy consistently with other test configurations in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to atomic flags or state strategies in the codebase
rg -i "atomic.*flag|state.*strategy" -A 3 -B 3
# Search for specific usages of Immediate strategy
ast-grep --pattern 'Immediate'
# Search for any deprecated annotations or comments related to migration
rg -i "deprecated.*atomic|migration.*atomic"
Length of output: 25299
24-24: Confirm the new state strategy works as expected.
Replacing "atomicStateUpdates" with "stateStrategy = Immediate" will alter how concurrency or atomicity is handled. Validate that tests cover scenarios where concurrency issues might arise under this new strategy. Also check if there's any need to mark the old property as @deprecated to guide adopters.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for relevant information about the state strategy and its usage in tests.
Let me search for more specific test scenarios and state handling implementations to better understand the context.
Based on the extensive code analysis, I can now provide a final response about the state strategy change:
The state strategy change is safe and well-documented
The change from atomicStateUpdates to stateStrategy = Immediate is a supported migration path. The codebase shows:
- The
atomicStateUpdatesproperty is properly deprecated with a direct replacement tostateStrategy = StateStrategy.Immediate Immediatestrategy is well-documented and designed for cases where atomic state updates are not required- Test files demonstrate proper handling of concurrent scenarios with both strategies
- The change appears in benchmark configurations, indicating performance considerations
The only recommendation would be to add tests specifically for concurrent state updates if not already present, as Immediate strategy does not guarantee thread-safety for state operations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files that might be using the state strategy
fd -e kt "Test" --exec rg -l "stateStrategy|atomicStateUpdates"
# Search for any usage of Immediate strategy
rg "stateStrategy\s*=\s*Immediate" -A 2 -B 2
# Look for any deprecated annotations related to atomicStateUpdates
rg "@Deprecated.*atomicStateUpdates"
# Search for test scenarios that might involve concurrent operations
ast-grep --pattern 'fun test$_() {
$$$
launch {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1892
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for test files content to understand concurrent testing scenarios
rg -A 10 -B 10 "class.*Test.*Store" ./core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/test/store/StoreStatesTest.kt
# Search for any documentation or implementation details about state strategies
rg -A 5 -B 5 "Immediate|StateStrategy" ./core
# Look for any migration guides or documentation about state handling
fd README -e md | xargs rg "state.*strategy|atomic.*updates" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 60026
core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/test/store/NestedRecoverTest.kt (1)
13-36: Consider verifying final store state and multiple exception types.
This test correctly ensures that an exception thrown in init is caught and handled gracefully. As an improvement, you may:
• Add an assertion to confirm the resulting store state after recovery.
• Include test coverage for additional exception types or repeated exceptions, if relevant.
sample/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/sample/ui/widgets/CodeView.kt (1)
88-95: Review and confirm UI accessibility improvements.
Increasing font size to 14sp, adding a monospaced font with weight W500, and widening the minimum width to 400dp collectively improve readability. Verify they align with your target accessibility guidelines and that there's no layout clipping on smaller screens.
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/Config.kt (1)
23-23: Removing the beta postfix effectively transitions this release to stable.
Ensure that downstream tasks, documentation, and distribution channels are aligned with a stable release version. Confirm external references no longer rely on the beta suffix.
core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/flowmvi/test/store/StoreExceptionsTest.kt (2)
8-8: No issues with the new imports
These imports from Kotest's null matchers are properly integrated and don't raise any concerns.
123-125: Verify usage of RecoverModule in tests
Ensuring that RecoverModule is null in init and not null in recover accurately verifies exception handling. If you plan to simulate real exception flow using your custom “catch” strategy, consider injecting the relevant logic from RecoverModule in the test store for more representative coverage.
debugger/ideplugin/src/main/resources/LiveTemplates.xml (10)
5-7: Top-level context availability
Declaring in the “fmvic” template ensures it can be used in top-level Kotlin contexts. This appears correct.
9-9: Template structure
No issues spotted with this line. The template name and parameters remain unchanged.
11-13: Improved composable template scope
Adding the top-level context for “fmvis” supports usage in top-level composable declarations.
15-15: Plugin template
No issues spotted on this line. The template definition is appropriate.
18-20: Ensuring top-level usage for plugin
Enabling top-level declarations here allows more flexibility in how the plugin can be declared and consumed.
22-22: Lazy plugin template
No problems detected. The template name and placeholders remain intact.
25-28: Extending lazy plugin contexts
Including KOTLIN_CLASS and KOTLIN_TOPLEVEL contexts broadens the usability of the “fmvilp” template.
32-36: Model definition in multiple contexts
Allowing KOTLIN_CLASS, KOTLIN_OBJECT_DECLARATION, and KOTLIN_TOPLEVEL makes it far more convenient to generate model definitions in various Kotlin scopes.
38-38: Decorator template
No issues introduced with this line. The template structure is unchanged.
42-42: Switching the context to KOTLIN_CLASS
Replacing KOTLIN_TOPLEVEL with KOTLIN_CLASS for the “fmvid” template aligns it with its intended usage for decorators within class scopes.
README.md (3)
124-124: New “Loading” state
Adding a data object for Loading clarifies the loading phase in your MVI state representation.
316-316: StoreViewModel usage
Encouraging StoreViewModel usage without subclassing ViewModel is a good approach for achieving a multiplatform-friendly architecture. This should simplify migration across platforms that do not have ViewModel.
143-155: Refined store configuration
Lines 143–155 add plugin installation and refine the “recover” and “init” blocks, improving clarity on how errors and initial data loading are handled. Verify that your analytics plugin is properly initialized before recovering from exceptions to avoid missing error data.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the analytics plugin initialization and error handling in the codebase.
Let me search for more specific error handling patterns and plugin initialization order.
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
Analytics plugin initialization is correctly ordered
The analytics plugin is installed before the error recovery block, which ensures that error data will be properly tracked. The codebase consistently follows this pattern across multiple implementations, where plugins are installed before the recover block. This allows the analytics plugin to capture all store events, including errors.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for analytics plugin initialization patterns
rg -A 5 "analyticsPlugin"
# Search for store configurations with analytics and error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'install($_) { $$$ recover { $$$ } $$$ }'
# Look for any analytics-related configuration files
fd -e kt -e java -e properties -e yaml -e json analytics
Length of output: 2445
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for store initialization patterns and error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
init {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Look for plugin installation order implementations
rg -B 3 -A 3 "install\("
# Search for error handling patterns with analytics
rg -B 2 -A 2 "State\.Error"
Length of output: 61282
docs/quickstart.md (2)
23-23: Version catalogs expand/collapse state
Switching the details section keeps the content structure but no functional issues detected.
311-311: Default store configuration
Providing a quick reference to store defaults is helpful. This line looks correct.
docs/CONTRIBUTING.md (1)
15-15: LGTM! Verify AGP compatibility.
The switch from "Canary" to "Stable" builds is a good change that promotes development environment stability. However, since this is tied to AGP compatibility, let's verify the current AGP version to ensure it works with the latest Android Studio Stable.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
15-15: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation
(MD007, ul-indent)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style
Chores