Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 add vendor dir to .gitignore #1618

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Adds vendor dir to .gitignore to avoid adding them by mistake

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@perdasilva perdasilva requested a review from a team as a code owner January 15, 2025 09:03
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 26db391
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/67890d64d7a85d000814dec0
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1618--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

.gitignore Outdated
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ catalogd.yaml

# Kubernetes Generated files - skip generated files, except for vendored files

vendor/
!vendor/**/zz_generated.*
Copy link
Contributor Author

@perdasilva perdasilva Jan 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Y'all reckon we need to keep !vendor/**/zz_generated.*? Won't it be generated anyway?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can test it out to see if I do not know this one.
I will defer this to others

Copy link
Member

@joelanford joelanford Jan 16, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need to keep !vendor/**/zz_generated.*. Looks like something that was cargo-culted from somewhere else.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not see why we would as well.
So, if we have not an historical context here

/lgtm
/approve

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Anyway, seems reasonable as well to ping @tmshort to ensure that we have no historical context for that.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.69%. Comparing base (da28803) to head (26db391).
Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1618   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.68%   66.69%           
=======================================
  Files          57       57           
  Lines        4584     4588    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits         3057     3060    +3     
- Misses       1302     1303    +1     
  Partials      225      225           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 52.75% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
unit 53.61% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 16, 2025
@joelanford joelanford enabled auto-merge January 16, 2025 15:52
@joelanford joelanford added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 16, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 16, 2025
@perdasilva perdasilva added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 17, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 17, 2025
@perdasilva perdasilva added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 17, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 17, 2025
@perdasilva perdasilva added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 17, 2025
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit 41a8154 Jan 17, 2025
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants