Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make comment about life cycle phase more helpful #5693

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

Make comment about life cycle phase more helpful #5693

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 6 additions & 2 deletions group.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -532,8 +532,12 @@ check_golang_versions: "x.y"
canonical_builders_from_upstream: True

# To decide whether to build and use signed RPMs, and to decide if a strict bug validation flow is necessary.
# If it will ship via errata (state=release), we want to build signed.
# For early access without an errata (state=pre-release), that is not required
# Possible values are defined here: https://github.com/openshift-eng/art-tools/blob/main/artcommon/artcommonlib/release_util.py#L55-L59
# At the moment of writing this comment, there are:
# - 'pre-release': For EC time
# - 'signing': for RC time
# - 'release': for post GA time
# - 'eol': For when a release will not formally ship anymore
software_lifecycle:
phase: pre-release

Expand Down
Loading