Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Remove unused yq test matchers package #1478

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

grdryn
Copy link
Member

@grdryn grdryn commented Jan 7, 2025

Description

Since this appears to be unused, it seems like a good idea to remove
it, since that causes a bunch of dependencies to be removed from the
go.mod file.

How Has This Been Tested?

n/a

Screenshot or short clip

Merge criteria

  • You have read the contributors guide.
  • Commit messages are meaningful - have a clear and concise summary and detailed explanation of what was changed and why.
  • Pull Request contains a description of the solution, a link to the JIRA issue, and to any dependent or related Pull Request.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

@grdryn grdryn requested review from lburgazzoli and removed request for gzaronikas January 7, 2025 14:32
@lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor

/test opendatahub-operator-e2e

@grdryn
Copy link
Member Author

grdryn commented Jan 7, 2025

/retest

@lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor

@grdryn failures are probably related to #1479

@grdryn
Copy link
Member Author

grdryn commented Jan 7, 2025

/retest

@lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor

@grdryn you may need to rebase to get the propagation policy fix

@grdryn
Copy link
Member Author

grdryn commented Jan 7, 2025

@grdryn you may need to rebase to get the propagation policy fix

I think Prow tests the merge of the source branch into the target branch, rather than just the tip of the source branch. If it fails then I'll rebase 🙂

@lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor

@grdryn you may need to rebase to get the propagation policy fix

I think Prow tests the merge of the source branch into the target branch, rather than just the tip of the source branch. If it fails then I'll rebase 🙂

Ah ok, just saw GitHub notification:

image

@grdryn
Copy link
Member Author

grdryn commented Jan 7, 2025

Huh, seems like it's not 🤔 I wonder if I have the wrong understanding in general or if we've got it configured differently for this project. Or maybe it does that merge test before merging only if it determines that the target has changed compared to what it previously tested against.

In any case, I'll rebase now 🙂

Since this appears to be unused, it seems like a good idea to remove
it, since that causes a bunch of dependencies to be removed from the
go.mod file.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (main@95f696a). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1478   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   18.72%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      154           
  Lines           ?    10276           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1924           
  Misses          ?     8139           
  Partials        ?      213           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Jan 8, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lburgazzoli

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Jan 8, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 2d7c4fa into opendatahub-io:main Jan 8, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants