Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: missing comopnent init step for Ray in main #1331

Conversation

zdtsw
Copy link
Member

@zdtsw zdtsw commented Oct 31, 2024

Description

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshot or short clip

Merge criteria

  • You have read the contributors guide.
  • Commit messages are meaningful - have a clear and concise summary and detailed explanation of what was changed and why.
  • Pull Request contains a description of the solution, a link to the JIRA issue, and to any dependent or related Pull Request.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

@zdtsw zdtsw changed the base branch from incubation to feature-operator-refactor October 31, 2024 12:52
@zdtsw zdtsw requested review from lburgazzoli and removed request for StevenTobin and jackdelahunt October 31, 2024 12:52
main.go Outdated
if err := rayctrl.Init(p); err != nil {
multiErr = multierror.Append(multiErr, err)
}
return multiErr
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe use ErrorOrNil() here so it is consistent with the standard error pattern

@zdtsw zdtsw changed the title Jira/13182 2 fix: missing comopnent init step for Ray in main Oct 31, 2024
Signed-off-by: Wen Zhou <wenzhou@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@VaishnaviHire VaishnaviHire left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 31, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: VaishnaviHire

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (feature-operator-refactor@a1f0e62). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                     Coverage Diff                      @@
##             feature-operator-refactor    #1331   +/-   ##
============================================================
  Coverage                             ?   24.54%           
============================================================
  Files                                ?       52           
  Lines                                ?     4273           
  Branches                             ?        0           
============================================================
  Hits                                 ?     1049           
  Misses                               ?     3095           
  Partials                             ?      129           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit f3fa346 into opendatahub-io:feature-operator-refactor Oct 31, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants