-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Add understanding lists data, first draft
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
55 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ | ||
--- | ||
id: understanding-lists-data | ||
title: 'Interpreting Lists Data' | ||
sidebar_label: Maintainers Guide Understanding Lists | ||
keywords: | ||
- maintainers | ||
- guides | ||
--- | ||
|
||
Once you've created your list of contributors, it's time to understand the data provided. Understanding this data is key to effectively managing your projects and contributors. | ||
|
||
- **Total Commits of a Group of Contributors in the Last 30 Days**. Understanding the commits over the last thirty days helps in gauging the overall activity and productivity of the group. | ||
|
||
High commit volume might indicate a highly active and engaged team. A sudden drop could signal potential issues or a need for additional support or motivation. | ||
|
||
- **Active Contributors in a Group in the Last 30 Days**. | ||
Identifying active contributors helps in recognizing reliable team members and planning future tasks. | ||
|
||
Trends in active contributor numbers can indicate the health of the project community and effectiveness of engagement strategies. | ||
|
||
- **New Contributors in a Group in the Last 30 Days**. | ||
Tracking new contributors is key to understanding the growth and influx of new talent. | ||
|
||
An influx of new contributors might be a positive sign of project popularity or successful outreach efforts. | ||
|
||
- **Alumni Contributors in a Group in the Last 30 Days** | ||
Identifying contributors who have stopped contributing helps in assessing potential issues or dissatisfaction. | ||
|
||
High churn rates could signal deeper problems within the project environment or community management. | ||
|
||
- **Most Active Contributors Over the Last 30 Days Compared with Others in a Set List** | ||
|
||
Helps in identifying key contributors and potential leaders. | ||
|
||
Can guide maintainers in delegation of responsibilities and recognition of top performers. | ||
|
||
- **Repositories Contributors in a List Have Contributed to Over the Last 30 Days** | ||
|
||
Offers insight into the range of interests or expertise of the contributors. | ||
|
||
Contributes to understanding cross-project collaborations and identifying potential areas for new collaborations. | ||
|
||
- **Last Repository Contributor to**. | ||
Provides a recent history of each contributor's engagement. | ||
|
||
Useful for tracking individual contribution patterns and identifying potentially cooling interests. | ||
|
||
- **Activity Level for Each Contributor in a List, Number of Repositories They've Contributed to, Languages They Used, and Contributions Over the Last 30 Days**. | ||
|
||
A comprehensive view of each contributor’s engagement, versatility, and areas of expertise. | ||
|
||
Assists in task allocation based on expertise, interest, and recent activity levels. | ||
- **The Timezones**.Vital for coordinating collaborative work and scheduling meetings. | ||
|
||
Can help in planning and ensuring that global teams are not facing timezone-related collaboration barriers. |