Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 28, 2024. It is now read-only.

fix: using labels instead of annotations for finding project namespace #70

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 26, 2023

Conversation

Skarlso
Copy link
Contributor

@Skarlso Skarlso commented Oct 26, 2023

Description

External Secrets is using label matching instead of annotations so it couldn't find the new project namespace.

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • 🍕 Feature
  • 🐛 Bug Fix
  • 📝 Documentation Update
  • 🎨 Style
  • 🧑‍💻 Code Refactor
  • 🔥 Performance Improvements
  • ✅ Test
  • 🤖 Build
  • 🔁 CI
  • 📦 Chore (Release)
  • ⏩ Revert

Related Tickets & Documents

  • Related Issue # (issue)
  • Closes # (issue)
  • Fixes # (issue)

Remove if not applicable

Screenshots

Added tests?

  • 👍 yes
  • 🙅 no, because they aren't needed
  • 🙋 no, because I need help
  • Separate ticket for tests # (issue/pr)

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

Added to documentation?

  • 📜 README.md
  • 🙅 no documentation needed

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@Skarlso Skarlso force-pushed the check-labels-instead-of-annotation branch from 346fb46 to 8f2ba0f Compare October 26, 2023 12:28
@Skarlso Skarlso merged commit 6ca2cc9 into main Oct 26, 2023
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants