Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add devnet-old #1142

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023
Merged

add devnet-old #1142

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

cfaur09
Copy link
Contributor

@cfaur09 cfaur09 commented Nov 6, 2023

Proposed Changes

  • add support for devnet-old configs

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (902cf2f) 33.96% compared to head (1ee1e9a) 33.96%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           development    #1142   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        33.96%   33.96%           
============================================
  Files                9        9           
  Lines              315      315           
  Branches            19       19           
============================================
  Hits               107      107           
  Misses             189      189           
  Partials            19       19           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 33.96% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tanghel tanghel merged commit f91cb1e into development Nov 6, 2023
6 of 7 checks passed
@tanghel tanghel deleted the SERVICES-1905-add-devnet-old-configs branch November 6, 2023 12:52
@cfaur09 cfaur09 added the feature New feature or request label Nov 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants