feat(audit): fixing typo in security review report

[tomrpl]

Updating the security review report

[MathisGD]

isn't it better to keep the same date?

[MerlinEgalite]

Same question, why changing the date?

[tomrpl]

@MathisGD @MerlinEgalite
They produced a new report for the typo, thus the date inside the doc has been updated as well.
Would you prefer it with the original data, but file updated?

[MathisGD]

@tomrpl yes original date (we don't really care about the date of the edit)

[Rubilmax]

@tomrpl yes original date (we don't really care about the date of the edit)

the date inside the doc has been updated so it's weird to have different dates

[MathisGD]

ok but if we find an other typo in 6 month we don't want to update the date right. What we care about is the date of the audit

[Rubilmax]

ok but if we find an other typo in 6 month we don't want to update the date right. What we care about is the date of the audit

I agree, but then we need to warn OZ not to update the date of the report?