Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

looker: Update heap size calculation for cgroups #23

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mattrobenolt
Copy link

When running within Docker, it's less than ideal to use /proc/meminfo since this is the memory on the entire node. Not what has been allocated to the running container. For that, we need to yank the data out of the cgroup limit instead.

For inspiration, this was mostly yanked out of what the RabbitMQ docker container does: https://github.com/docker-library/rabbitmq/blob/master/3.7/alpine/docker-entrypoint.sh#L300-L316

When running within Docker, it's less than ideal to use /proc/meminfo since this is the memory on the entire node. Not what has been allocated to the running container. For that, we need to yank the data out of the cgroup limit instead.

For inspiration, this was mostly yanked out of what the RabbitMQ docker container does: https://github.com/docker-library/rabbitmq/blob/master/3.7/alpine/docker-entrypoint.sh#L300-L316
memLimitKb="$memTotalKb"
fi
JAVAMEM="$(awk -v limKb="$memLimitKb" 'BEGIN{
limKb = limKb * 6 / 10;
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I kept this math the same, but using 60% feels a bit wrong to me, if your goal is to basically be limKb = limKb - (1024 * 1024 * 1.5);

So let me know if you want me to accommodate for that instead, I just didn't wanna change behavior.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems imo, if we have a cgroup, we can set the limit to exactly the cgroup (maybe subtract a few MB to keep some breathing room), and apply the 60% or some -1.5GB of the value comes from the whole system's memory. If we're running within a container, I'm not sure why we'd need to have that much breathing room.

Copy link

@mconigliaro mconigliaro Mar 1, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The JVM has support for containers now, so you can just use something like: -XX:MaxRAMPercentagerather=90.0.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is probably irrelevant now since as you mentioned the JVM now supports automatically setting the heap size when it detects it is running in a container.

However, when running on Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS the /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/memory.limit_in_bytes file seems to have been replaced by /sys/fs/cgroup/memory.max.

For me, running this in docker, the memory.max file stores the max memory limit in bytes.

$ cat /sys/fs/cgroup/memory.max
4294967296

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excuse my ignorance of cgroups, this seems to be a platform issue, when running Docker Desktop on MacOS /sys/fs/cgroup/memory.max is the file but when running on a Linux node the file was /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/memory.limit_in_bytes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants