-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
looker: Update heap size calculation for cgroups #23
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
When running within Docker, it's less than ideal to use /proc/meminfo since this is the memory on the entire node. Not what has been allocated to the running container. For that, we need to yank the data out of the cgroup limit instead. For inspiration, this was mostly yanked out of what the RabbitMQ docker container does: https://github.com/docker-library/rabbitmq/blob/master/3.7/alpine/docker-entrypoint.sh#L300-L316
memLimitKb="$memTotalKb" | ||
fi | ||
JAVAMEM="$(awk -v limKb="$memLimitKb" 'BEGIN{ | ||
limKb = limKb * 6 / 10; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I kept this math the same, but using 60% feels a bit wrong to me, if your goal is to basically be limKb = limKb - (1024 * 1024 * 1.5);
So let me know if you want me to accommodate for that instead, I just didn't wanna change behavior.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems imo, if we have a cgroup, we can set the limit to exactly the cgroup (maybe subtract a few MB to keep some breathing room), and apply the 60% or some -1.5GB of the value comes from the whole system's memory. If we're running within a container, I'm not sure why we'd need to have that much breathing room.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The JVM has support for containers now, so you can just use something like: -XX:MaxRAMPercentagerather=90.0
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is probably irrelevant now since as you mentioned the JVM now supports automatically setting the heap size when it detects it is running in a container.
However, when running on Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS the /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/memory.limit_in_bytes
file seems to have been replaced by /sys/fs/cgroup/memory.max
.
For me, running this in docker, the memory.max file stores the max memory limit in bytes.
$ cat /sys/fs/cgroup/memory.max
4294967296
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Excuse my ignorance of cgroups, this seems to be a platform issue, when running Docker Desktop on MacOS /sys/fs/cgroup/memory.max
is the file but when running on a Linux node the file was /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/memory.limit_in_bytes
When running within Docker, it's less than ideal to use /proc/meminfo since this is the memory on the entire node. Not what has been allocated to the running container. For that, we need to yank the data out of the cgroup limit instead.
For inspiration, this was mostly yanked out of what the RabbitMQ docker container does: https://github.com/docker-library/rabbitmq/blob/master/3.7/alpine/docker-entrypoint.sh#L300-L316