-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: mui theme #990
fix: mui theme #990
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
app/layout.tsxOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.17.0 ESLint couldn't find an eslint.config.(js|mjs|cjs) file. From ESLint v9.0.0, the default configuration file is now eslint.config.js. https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/configure/migration-guide If you still have problems after following the migration guide, please stop by WalkthroughThe pull request involves restructuring the theming approach in the application. The changes primarily focus on removing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
app/layout.tsx
(3 hunks)app/provider.tsx
(1 hunks)components/UI/theme.tsx
(0 hunks)styles/theme.ts
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- components/UI/theme.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (5)
styles/theme.ts (1)
23-40
: Review mobile breakpoint consistency
The mobile breakpoint of 768px should be consistent with other responsive breakpoints in the application.
✅ Verification successful
Breakpoint of 768px is consistent with application's mobile breakpoints
The verification shows that 768px is consistently used as a mobile breakpoint across multiple files:
styles/category.module.css
:@media screen and (max-width: 768px)
styles/analytics.module.css
:@media screen and (max-width: 768px)
styles/dashboard.module.css
:@media (max-width: 768px)
styles/components/navbar.module.css
:@media (max-width: 768px)
styles/components/land.module.css
:@media (max-width: 768px)
- Multiple React components using
useMediaQuery("(max-width:768px)")
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other breakpoint definitions
rg -g '*.{tsx,ts,css}' '(min-width:|max-width:)\s*\d+' --type-add 'css:*.{css,scss}'
Length of output: 5639
app/layout.tsx (2)
58-60
: LGTM: Simplified component hierarchy
The removal of redundant ThemeProvider wrapper improves the component hierarchy, as theme is now properly managed through the Providers component.
12-14
: Verify metadataBase URL handling
The conditional URL creation could potentially return undefined. Consider providing a fallback URL.
app/provider.tsx (2)
24-24
: LGTM: Clean theme import
The theme import from a centralized location improves maintainability and follows best practices.
Line range hint 56-56
: LGTM: Proper theme provider usage
The ThemeProvider is correctly positioned in the component tree, ensuring theme context is available to all child components.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ThemeProvider
.Bug Fixes
disableScrollLock
property for improved user experience.Style