Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: mui theme #990

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

fix: mui theme #990

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

Marchand-Nicolas
Copy link
Collaborator

@Marchand-Nicolas Marchand-Nicolas commented Dec 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Simplified component structure by removing the ThemeProvider.
    • Centralized theme configuration by importing from a dedicated theme module.
    • Enhanced theme color palette and added specific styling for modal and tab components.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted modal behavior with disableScrollLock property for improved user experience.
  • Style

    • Improved formatting of metadata for better readability.

@Marchand-Nicolas Marchand-Nicolas added the 🔥 Ready for review This pull request needs a review label Dec 16, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 16, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sepolia-starknet-quest ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 20, 2024 9:49am
starknet-quest ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 20, 2024 9:49am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 eslint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

app/layout.tsx

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 9.17.0

ESLint couldn't find an eslint.config.(js|mjs|cjs) file.

From ESLint v9.0.0, the default configuration file is now eslint.config.js.
If you are using a .eslintrc.* file, please follow the migration guide
to update your configuration file to the new format:

https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/configure/migration-guide

If you still have problems after following the migration guide, please stop by
https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team.

Walkthrough

The pull request involves restructuring the theming approach in the application. The changes primarily focus on removing the ThemeProvider from the layout, allowing Navbar, main, and Footer components to be direct children of the Providers component. The theme configuration has been centralized by importing it from styles/theme.ts, eliminating inline definitions. Additionally, the color palette has been updated, and specific style overrides for modal and tab components have been introduced.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/layout.tsx Removed ThemeProvider wrapping, simplified component structure.
app/provider.tsx Imported theme from @styles/theme, removed inline theme creation logic.
components/UI/theme.tsx Deleted theme configuration file.
styles/theme.ts Updated color palette, added component-specific style overrides for modals and tabs.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

❌ Change request


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2d0c85 and b308f36.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/layout.tsx (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 26fad1c and d2d0c85.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • app/layout.tsx (3 hunks)
  • app/provider.tsx (1 hunks)
  • components/UI/theme.tsx (0 hunks)
  • styles/theme.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • components/UI/theme.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (5)
styles/theme.ts (1)

23-40: Review mobile breakpoint consistency

The mobile breakpoint of 768px should be consistent with other responsive breakpoints in the application.

✅ Verification successful

Breakpoint of 768px is consistent with application's mobile breakpoints

The verification shows that 768px is consistently used as a mobile breakpoint across multiple files:

  • styles/category.module.css: @media screen and (max-width: 768px)
  • styles/analytics.module.css: @media screen and (max-width: 768px)
  • styles/dashboard.module.css: @media (max-width: 768px)
  • styles/components/navbar.module.css: @media (max-width: 768px)
  • styles/components/land.module.css: @media (max-width: 768px)
  • Multiple React components using useMediaQuery("(max-width:768px)")
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other breakpoint definitions
rg -g '*.{tsx,ts,css}' '(min-width:|max-width:)\s*\d+' --type-add 'css:*.{css,scss}'

Length of output: 5639

app/layout.tsx (2)

58-60: LGTM: Simplified component hierarchy

The removal of redundant ThemeProvider wrapper improves the component hierarchy, as theme is now properly managed through the Providers component.


12-14: Verify metadataBase URL handling

The conditional URL creation could potentially return undefined. Consider providing a fallback URL.

app/provider.tsx (2)

24-24: LGTM: Clean theme import

The theme import from a centralized location improves maintainability and follows best practices.


Line range hint 56-56: LGTM: Proper theme provider usage

The ThemeProvider is correctly positioned in the component tree, ensuring theme context is available to all child components.

styles/theme.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
styles/theme.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
styles/theme.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@fricoben fricoben left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🔥 Ready for review This pull request needs a review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants