Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

collect acc-tx pair from contract creaton/call events #60

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

Vritra4
Copy link
Collaborator

@Vritra4 Vritra4 commented Aug 31, 2024

collect acc-tx pair from contract creaton/call events

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Improvements
    • Enhanced address extraction logic from transaction attributes for better clarity and maintainability.
    • Introduced specific handling for EVM events and contract attributes, improving error handling during extraction.
    • Streamlined control flow while preserving original functionality for address detection.

@Vritra4 Vritra4 requested review from SeUkKim and joon9823 August 31, 2024 08:26
@Vritra4 Vritra4 self-assigned this Aug 31, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve refactoring the grepAddressesFromTx function to improve the logic for extracting addresses from transaction attributes. The implementation transitions from an if statement to a switch statement, enhancing readability. Specific cases for EVM events and contract attributes are introduced, and dedicated functions are used for address extraction, ensuring error handling is maintained. The default behavior for finding Bech32 and Hex addresses is preserved.

Changes

Files Change Summary
submodules/evm-tx/collect.go Refactored grepAddressesFromTx function to use a switch statement for address extraction based on event types, improving readability and maintainability. Introduced specific cases for EVM events and contract attributes, while maintaining original functionality for Bech32 and Hex addresses.

Poem

In the meadow where I hop,
Changes made, oh what a stop!
Switches now, so clear and bright,
Extracting addresses just feels right.
With every loop, we dance and play,
Hopping through code, come what may! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a473ea9 and 1b70d8b.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • submodules/evm-tx/collect.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
submodules/evm-tx/collect.go (1)

116-129: Refactoring of grepAddressesFromTx enhances readability and maintainability.

The switch statement introduced in the grepAddressesFromTx function improves the structure and clarity of the code. Each case is well-defined for different event types, which should make future modifications easier.

  • Readability: The use of a switch statement over an if-else chain is a good practice in scenarios where multiple conditions are checked. It makes the code cleaner and easier to understand.
  • Maintainability: With clearly separated cases, adding new event types or modifying existing ones becomes simpler.

Suggestions:

  • Add Comments: Consider adding detailed comments explaining each case, especially for complex conditions. This will help other developers understand the context and logic behind each case.
  • Verify Integration: Ensure that this function's changes integrate seamlessly with the rest of the system, particularly how extracted addresses are used downstream.

Run the following script to verify the integration of the function:

Verification successful

The grepAddressesFromTx function is correctly integrated and refactored for clarity.

The grepAddressesFromTx function has distinct implementations in submodules/tx/collect.go and submodules/evm-tx/collect.go, each tailored to specific needs. The refactoring in submodules/evm-tx/collect.go enhances readability and maintainability by using a switch statement to handle different event types.

  • Distinct Implementations: The function serves different purposes in each file, with the EVM-specific logic in submodules/evm-tx/collect.go and a more generic approach in submodules/tx/collect.go.
  • Correct Integration: The function is appropriately integrated into both contexts, handling address extraction as intended.

No further action is needed regarding the integration or refactoring of this function.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of `grepAddressesFromTx` function with the rest of the system.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper handling of extracted addresses.
rg --type go -A 5 $'grepAddressesFromTx'

Length of output: 1483


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Compare the implementations of `grepAddressesFromTx` in both files to check for duplication or differences.

# Extract the function implementation from submodules/tx/collect.go
echo "Implementation in submodules/tx/collect.go:"
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func grepAddressesFromTx($_) { $$$ }' submodules/tx/collect.go

# Extract the function implementation from submodules/evm-tx/collect.go
echo "Implementation in submodules/evm-tx/collect.go:"
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func grepAddressesFromTx($_) { $$$ }' submodules/evm-tx/collect.go

Length of output: 395


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Adjust the pattern to correctly capture the function implementations of `grepAddressesFromTx`.

# Extract the function implementation from submodules/tx/collect.go
echo "Implementation in submodules/tx/collect.go:"
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func grepAddressesFromTx($_) ($$$) { $$$ }' submodules/tx/collect.go

# Extract the function implementation from submodules/evm-tx/collect.go
echo "Implementation in submodules/evm-tx/collect.go:"
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func grepAddressesFromTx($_) ($$$) { $$$ }' submodules/evm-tx/collect.go

Length of output: 3615

Copy link
Collaborator

@joon9823 joon9823 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Vritra4 Vritra4 merged commit f3b0e30 into main Sep 2, 2024
4 checks passed
@Vritra4 Vritra4 deleted the evm-index-contract-events branch September 2, 2024 02:34
@Vritra4 Vritra4 restored the evm-index-contract-events branch September 2, 2024 02:34
@Vritra4 Vritra4 deleted the evm-index-contract-events branch September 2, 2024 02:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants