Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update concrete assessment cases after removing deprecated syntax #321

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bwspenc
Copy link
Collaborator

@bwspenc bwspenc commented Dec 21, 2022

ref #318

A recent change removed usage of deprecated syntax in these tests. This resulted in an unexpected change in the model behavior because of a memory access bug that was only triggered by the old syntax. This updates the gold results for the Wald block tests.

The newer results show greater expansion than before, but the difference is minor, and in many cases gives better agreement with experimental results.

…daholab#318

A recent change removed usage of deprecated syntax in these tests.
This resulted in an unexpected change in the model behavior because
of a memory access bug that was only triggered by the old syntax.
This updates the gold results for the Wald block tests.

The newer results show greater expansion than before, but the difference
is minor, and in many cases gives better agreement with experimental
results.
@moosebuild
Copy link

Job Test on e2301b7 wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.

@moosebuild
Copy link

Job Coverage on e2301b7 wanted to post the following:

Coverage

Coverage did not change

Full coverage report

This comment will be updated on new commits.

@bwspenc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bwspenc commented Feb 21, 2023

This was addressed by #331

@bwspenc bwspenc closed this Feb 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants