Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support ghc 9.12 #497

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

erikd
Copy link

@erikd erikd commented Dec 3, 2024

Also bump upper bound on hashable dependency.

Currently needs the following in a cabal.project file:

allow-newer:
  , hashable:base
  , splitmix:base
  , tagged:template-haskell
  , vector-stream:ghc-prim

Also bump upper bound on hashable dependency.
@brandonchinn178
Copy link

@treeowl Could we merge this?

I believe this would also close #490

cc @Bodigrim

@Bodigrim
Copy link
Contributor

Given that there were no developments in master since the release of unordered-containers-0.2.20, let me use my Hackage Trustee powers and make a revision, because otherwise it blocks lots of work:

https://hackage.haskell.org/package/unordered-containers-0.2.20/revisions/

@treeowl hopefully it's alright with you. I checked that the test suite compiles and passes. It would be great if you could consider assigning more maintainers to take care of business-as-usual support.

@treeowl
Copy link
Collaborator

treeowl commented Dec 21, 2024

@Bodigrim, I was taking care of my mother for the last eight months. She died last week, so I should have some more time for software activities. But note that @sjakobi has been more active in this project lately than I have.

@Bodigrim
Copy link
Contributor

My deepest condolences to you, David, and I'm terribly sorry for bad timing on my part. Take care and take your time.

I have not seen @sjakobi around for a while, unfortunately.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants