Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Alexarnoldy net app doc updates #74

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alexarnoldy
Copy link

I have updated this document to allow for newer software versions. I've also adjusted it to match the change in NetApp's chart and app version changes. Lastly, I've changed some of the parameters in the resources (e.g. the StorageClass) based on my own experiences.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Deploy Preview for harvester-home-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 780615e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/harvester-home-preview/deploys/678833037602470008281eee
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-74--harvester-home-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@ibrokethecloud
Copy link
Contributor

The change removes the validated chart version with a variable? was that intentional?
We have not really done any specific work to validate different harvester versions against netapp trident versions, unless you have some info on various harvester version + trident version combinations that are known to work

@alexarnoldy
Copy link
Author

It's a good observation. Yes, that was intentional. My reasoning is that if we haven't validated any specific version, we should give the user the opportunity to select any version that is available in the repo.

@alexarnoldy
Copy link
Author

Hello @ibrokethecloud, Does this format need to be changed for this PR to be merged? There are much more important fixes in this PR that fix things that are actually broken.

@ibrokethecloud
Copy link
Contributor

I have no issue with the format, the only item I'd fix is revert the change to original version we had tested it with.

Looks like the search and replace has removed the version we actually tested it against.

image

@alexarnoldy
Copy link
Author

alexarnoldy commented Jan 15, 2025 via email

@alexarnoldy
Copy link
Author

alexarnoldy commented Jan 15, 2025 via email

Copy link
Contributor

@ibrokethecloud ibrokethecloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants