Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable GitAuto to respond in a language users used #381

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hiroshinishio
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@hiroshinishio hiroshinishio merged commit 5730782 into main Nov 18, 2024
2 checks passed
@hiroshinishio hiroshinishio deleted the wes branch November 18, 2024 03:09
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @hiroshinishio - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider adding language detection validation and a fallback mechanism (e.g., defaulting to English) in case the input language cannot be reliably determined.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link

benchify bot commented Nov 18, 2024

🧪 Benchify Analysis of PR 381

We were unable to fetch wes (likely because the PR was merged and the branch deleted) so analyzed main instead.

Summary of Property-Based Testing Results

The testing results indicate that the write_pr_body function in services/openai/instructions/write_pr_body.py passed all tests, confirming that the template includes necessary sections for bug fixes and feature requests.

However, a potential issue was found in the update_comment function in services/openai/instructions/update_comment.py, which encountered an unexpected exception when testing if the function correctly updates the comment with the exact string provided as input. This may indicate a bug in the function that needs to be investigated and fixed.

Next Steps

  • Investigate the cause of the unexpected exception in the update_comment function and fix the issue.
  • Continue testing the update_comment function to ensure it works correctly.
  • Consider adding more test cases to cover different scenarios and edge cases.
File Example Input # Inputs Found Description
💥 services/openai/instructions/update_comment.py comment='o' 91 An unexpected exception occurred while testing if the update_comment function correctly updates the comment with the exact string provided as input.
services/openai/instructions/write_pr_body.py issue_content='j' 100 The template should include sections for bug fixes, ensuring that the pull request body contains sections for the cause of the bug, reproduction steps, and fix.
services/openai/instructions/write_pr_body.py issue_content='j' 100 The template should include sections for feature requests, ensuring that the pull request body contains sections for feature description, necessity, implementation plan, and backward compatibility.
Reproducible Unit Tests
import jsonpickle
import unittest
import time


from services.openai.instructions.update_comment import *
# Property: The function `update_comment` should correctly update the comment in a GitHub issue or pull request with the exact string provided as input, ensuring idempotency.
def benchify_test_update_comment_idempotency(comment):
    # Assuming update_comment is a function that updates a comment in a GitHub issue or pull request
    # First update
    update_comment(comment)
    # Second update with the same comment
    update_comment(comment)
    # Check if the comment remains the same after the second update
    # This is a placeholder for the actual check, as the function's implementation is not provided
    # assert get_current_comment() == comment


# The next batch of tests throw unexpected exceptions.
def test_update_comment_idempotency_exception_0():
    comment=''
    benchify_test_update_comment_idempotency(comment)

def test_update_comment_idempotency_exception_1():
    comment='z'
    benchify_test_update_comment_idempotency(comment)

def test_update_comment_idempotency_exception_2():
    comment='D'
    benchify_test_update_comment_idempotency(comment)

# Found 88 more tests that throw unexpected exceptions.


from services.openai.instructions.write_pr_body import *
# Property: The template should include sections for bug fixes, ensuring that the pull request body contains sections for the cause of the bug, reproduction steps, and fix.

def benchify_test_bug_fix_template_includes_sections(issue_content):
    pr_body = WRITE_PR_BODY.format(issue_content=issue_content)
    assert '## Why the bug occurs' in pr_body
    assert '## How to reproduce' in pr_body
    assert '## How to fix' in pr_body


# The next batch of tests are passing.
def test_bug_fix_template_includes_sections_passing_0():
    issue_content=''
    benchify_test_bug_fix_template_includes_sections(issue_content)

def test_bug_fix_template_includes_sections_passing_1():
    issue_content='s'
    benchify_test_bug_fix_template_includes_sections(issue_content)

def test_bug_fix_template_includes_sections_passing_2():
    issue_content='j'
    benchify_test_bug_fix_template_includes_sections(issue_content)

# Found 97 more passing tests.# Property: The template should include sections for feature requests, ensuring that the pull request body contains sections for feature description, necessity, implementation plan, and backward compatibility.

def benchify_test_feature_request_template_includes_sections(issue_content):
    pr_body = WRITE_PR_BODY.format(issue_content=issue_content)
    assert '## What is the feature' in pr_body
    assert '## Why we need the feature' in pr_body
    assert '## How to implement and why' in pr_body
    assert '## About backward compatibility' in pr_body


# The next batch of tests are passing.
def test_feature_request_template_includes_sections_passing_0():
    issue_content=''
    benchify_test_feature_request_template_includes_sections(issue_content)

def test_feature_request_template_includes_sections_passing_1():
    issue_content='f'
    benchify_test_feature_request_template_includes_sections(issue_content)

def test_feature_request_template_includes_sections_passing_2():
    issue_content='c'
    benchify_test_feature_request_template_includes_sections(issue_content)

# Found 97 more passing tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant