Add Service Bus emulator support

[sebastienros]

Description

Add support for the Service Bus emulator https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/messagingonazureblog/introducing-local-emulator-for-azure-service-bus/4304457

This PR introduces a custom model to configure the emulator and the cloud service. There is another branch that was based on the CDK directly (and use it for the emulator JSON too) but some discussions led to create a custom, simplified one (not really simplified here for the sake of understanding limits), that is then converted to JSON for the emulator, and to CDK resources for provisioning. If the model is not sufficient (can be on purpose to limit it to what users use in most cases) then the emulator configuration can be defined in JSON directly via WithConfigJson(path), customized with RunAsEmulator(c => c.ConfigJson(JsonNode)), and the CDK resources can be enhanced with the existing ConfigureInfrastructure().

Fixes #6605

Checklist

• Is this feature complete?
  • Yes. Ready to ship.
  • No. Follow-up changes expected.
• Are you including unit tests for the changes and scenario tests if relevant?
  • Yes
  • No
• Did you add public API?
  • Yes
    • If yes, did you have an API Review for it?
      • Yes
      • No
    • Did you add <remarks /> and <code /> elements on your triple slash comments?
      • Yes
      • No
  • No
• Does the change make any security assumptions or guarantees?
  • Yes
    • If yes, have you done a threat model and had a security review?
      • Yes
      • No
  • No
• Does the change require an update in our Aspire docs?
  • Yes
    • Is this introducing a breaking change?
      • Yes
        • Link to aspire-docs issue (please use this breaking-change template):
      • No
        • Link to aspire-docs issue (please use this doc-idea template):
  • No

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

[davidfowl]

How close is this to merging

[sebastienros]

I pushed the wrong branch :/ I wanted to update the EventHubs one and not lose my nice green build ... reverting

[sebastienros]

How close is this to merging

If you ask me it's perfect. But I haven't had an approval yet so I must be wrong

[davidfowl]

I want to play with it 🙂. I think this is a good enough strawman to decide on follow ups. Should we mark some of these APIs experimental to get some leeway to change them?

[sebastienros]

I want to play with it

Check the playground app I created. And also the provisioning part, it should provision queues/topics... There is a callback to customize the CDK objects, adding properties that don't matter locally, or are not available in the "common" model between the emulator and cdk.

[eerhardt]

This LGTM! Nice work here. This is going to be a very useful feature that our customers will enjoy. Let's get it merged.

[davidfowl]

/azp run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[davidfowl]

The functions test is failing