Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HADOOP-19289. Upgrade protobuf-java to 3.25.5 #38

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2024

Conversation

pjfanning
Copy link
Contributor

NOTICE

Please create an issue in ASF JIRA before opening a pull request,
and you need to set the title of the pull request which starts with
the corresponding JIRA issue number. (e.g. HADOOP-XXXXX. Fix a typo in YYY.)
For more details, please see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/How+To+Contribute

HADOOP-19289 - CVE in Protubuf-java

@steveloughran
Copy link
Contributor

merged #39 so if you can force push this again and all should be good.

It's too late for 3.4.1, but I'm already thinking of a 3.4.2 with mostly jar updates and stuff already on 3.4; a very minimal iteration to push out a couple of months after 3.4.1

@pjfanning
Copy link
Contributor Author

I agree that it is not worth delaying Hadoop 3.4.1. I've rebased this PR and it should pass CI on this run.

@pjfanning pjfanning changed the title HADOOP-19289. Protubuf-java 3.25.5 HADOOP-19289. Protobuf-java 3.25.5 Sep 25, 2024
@adoroszlai adoroszlai changed the title HADOOP-19289. Protobuf-java 3.25.5 HADOOP-19289. Upgrade protobuf-java to 3.25.5 Oct 30, 2024
@adoroszlai adoroszlai merged commit 5bce66a into apache:trunk Oct 30, 2024
3 checks passed
@adoroszlai
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @pjfanning for the patch, @steveloughran for the review.

@pjfanning pjfanning deleted the patch-1 branch October 30, 2024 09:22
adoroszlai pushed a commit to adoroszlai/hadoop-thirdparty that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants