Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check for Micro for 6.0 and 6.1 #1266

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025
Merged

Check for Micro for 6.0 and 6.1 #1266

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

jesusbv
Copy link
Collaborator

@jesusbv jesusbv commented Dec 30, 2024

Description

As Micro 6.0 and 6.1 have 'SL-Micro' as identifier adjust the check to Micro to keep it working
for SUMA and for bsc#1230419

  • Related Issue / Ticket / Trello card:

How to test

Start a PAYG SL-Micro instance for 6.0 or 6.1 , it should register without issues

Change Type

Please select the correct option.

  • Bug Fix (a non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New Feature (a non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
  • Documentation Update (a change which only updates documentation)

Checklist

Please check off each item if the requirement is met.

  • I have reviewed my own code and believe that it's ready for an external review.
  • I have provided comments for any hard-to-understand code.
  • I have documented the MANUAL.md file with any changes to the user experience.
  • If my changes are non-trivial, I have added a changelog entry to notify users at package/obs/rmt-server.changes.

Review

Please check out our review guidelines
and get in touch with the author to get a shared understanding of the change.

As Micro 6.0 and 6.1 have 'SL-Micro' as identifier
adjust the check to Micro to keep it working
for SUMA and for bsc#1230419
@jesusbv jesusbv self-assigned this Dec 30, 2024
Copy link
Member

@digitaltom digitaltom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add this to the changelog

@rjschwei
Copy link
Member

@digitaltom this also means we are going to need 2.21 as soon as rmt-2.20 made it through the cycle.

@digitaltom digitaltom added the 2.21 label Jan 9, 2025
@jesusbv jesusbv merged commit 269f985 into master Jan 9, 2025
3 checks passed
@jesusbv jesusbv deleted the sle-micro-rename branch January 9, 2025 17:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants