Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GitHub Action: Complete conversion of testing to PyTest / CodeCov #249

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

im-vedant
Copy link

@im-vedant im-vedant commented Jan 8, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Issue Number:

Fixes #180

Snapshots/Videos:

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • CI/CD Workflow Updates
    • Removed docstring compliance checks
    • Added code coverage reporting and verification
    • Updated test configuration to focus on the switchmap module
    • Enhanced coverage reporting with Codecov integration

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow files, specifically .github/workflows/pull-request.yml and .github/workflows/push.yml. The changes focus on enhancing test coverage reporting and configuration, including adding a new job to check code coverage, updating dependency installations, modifying test running commands, and removing the docstring compliance job. The workflow now uses Codecov with LCOV format and integrates the VeryGoodOpenSource/very_good_coverage action for coverage validation.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml - Removed Docstring-Compliance job
- Added new job to check code coverage
- Updated Test-Application job to include coverage package
- Modified test running command to specify switchmap module coverage
.github/workflows/push.yml - Renamed Test-Application-Code-Coverage to Test-Application
- Added dependency on Code-Quality-Checks
- Updated coverage report format to LCOV
- Added coverage check step using very_good_coverage action

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Convert tests to pytest
Validate workflow configuration
Code coverage calculation accuracy
Codecov configuration
Uncomment VeryGoodOpenSource section
Remove tests/bin/_do_all_tests.py Not visible in this PR

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code, a workflow springs to life,
Coverage reports dance, cutting through testing strife
Pytest marches on, with Codecov's keen eye
Efficiency blooms, as old methods say goodbye
A rabbit's code review, swift and bright! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

🎯 Contacting the person who assigned the mentors is not advised unless they make a request. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

@im-vedant
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (3)

172-172: Optimize test coverage dependencies

pytest-cov already includes coverage as a dependency. Installing both packages separately is redundant and could potentially lead to version conflicts.

-          pip install pytest-cov coverage
+          pip install pytest-cov

180-181: Remove trailing whitespace

Line 181 contains trailing whitespace which should be removed.

-          pytest --cov=switchmap --cov-report=lcov --cov-report=term-missing tests/switchmap_
-          
+          pytest --cov=switchmap --cov-report=lcov --cov-report=term-missing tests/switchmap_
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 181-181: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


183-192: Consider enhancing CodeCov configuration

Two suggestions to improve the CodeCov integration:

  1. Consider setting fail_ci_if_error: true to ensure coverage data is always uploaded successfully
  2. Move the gcov_ignore configuration to a .codecov.yml file for better maintainability

Would you like me to help you create a .codecov.yml configuration file?

.github/workflows/push.yml (2)

53-53: Optimize test dependencies.

pytest-cov already includes coverage as a dependency. Installing both packages is redundant and could lead to version conflicts.

-          pip install pytest-cov coverage
+          pip install pytest-cov

64-72: Consider enabling CI failure on coverage upload errors.

Setting fail_ci_if_error: false might hide coverage upload issues. Consider enabling it to ensure coverage data is always properly uploaded.

          verbose: true
          files: ./coverage.lcov
          gcov_ignore: "docs/"
-          fail_ci_if_error: false
+          fail_ci_if_error: true
          name: "${{env.CODECOV_UNIQUE_NAME}}"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b50b98 and e522e6a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/push.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml

[error] 181-181: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/push.yml

[error] 62-62: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 78-78: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/push.yml

25-25: job "test-application" needs job "code-quality-checks" which does not exist in this workflow

(job-needs)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)

180-196: Verify coverage report path consistency

Let's ensure the coverage report path is consistently referenced across the workflow.

✅ Verification successful

Coverage report configuration is consistent

The coverage report path './coverage.lcov' is consistently referenced across the workflow, and the pytest command correctly generates the coverage report in the expected format and location.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check consistency of coverage report path references

# Search for all references to coverage report paths
echo "Checking coverage report path references:"
rg -i 'coverage|\.lcov' .github/workflows/

Length of output: 1600


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the pytest commands that generate coverage reports
echo "Checking pytest coverage generation commands:"
rg -i 'pytest.*--cov' .github/workflows/

Length of output: 393

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 181-181: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/push.yml (1)

61-62: Remove trailing spaces and verify test directory coverage.

  1. Remove trailing spaces after the command.
  2. Verify that targeting only tests/switchmap_ covers all your test files. Consider using tests/ if you have tests in other directories.

Let's check for any test files that might be missed:

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 62-62: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/pull-request.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/push.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/push.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. This must be restored. You have negatively affected the functioning of our GitHub workflows.
  2. Please merge with the latest upstream

image

Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comments

.github/workflows/pull-request.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@im-vedant im-vedant requested a review from palisadoes January 9, 2025 06:11
Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comment

.github/workflows/push.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 10, 2025
@im-vedant im-vedant requested a review from palisadoes January 10, 2025 09:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants