📝 Condition and Family Module Drafts #54
Conversation
awarkow
added this to the NCPI IG V2 Modules - Technical and Business Writing milestone
🚀 IG Site Preview DeployedLatest commit: f790be8 |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| This distinction is similar to those in OMOP and FHIR, though it does not map precisely. Critically in OMOP and FHIR, Condition_occurrence and Condition are ALWAYS a positive assertion (though they may be wrong). “Assertions of history of disease” are observations in OMOP, eg, ICD9CM V-codes like “Personal history of malignant neoplasm of breast” go in Observation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm wondering if calling it "Condition Module" is going to make people assume we're using the FHIR Condition resource under the hood? And that this piece is too buried in the versus being a bit up front that it's actually an Observation and/or that we're talking more generically about it versus the specific Condition resource?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One other thought on this: The "Condition Module" should ALSO have a condition profile IMO. The "Condition Summary" resource would help round this out. I think we want people looking for "Conditions" or looking for "Condition Resources" to come here to understand what we are doing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am going to merge the current state of these changes but open a ticket to add updates @RobertJCarroll is describing here.
Motivation
We need module documentation for family and condition
Approach
Starts a draft for each of these pages