-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Create Minutes Steering Committee No.7 - 14 Sept 2023.md
Adding minutes
- Loading branch information
1 parent
6aeaa6d
commit a21f41a
Showing
1 changed file
with
88 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
88 changes: 88 additions & 0 deletions
88
SteeringCommittee/Minutes Steering Committee No.7 - 14 Sept 2023.md
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ | ||
# Minutes of RDLS Steering Committee No. 7 | ||
|
||
14 September 2023 / 09:00-10:30 EDT, 14:00-15:30 GMT / via Teams | ||
|
||
## Attendees | ||
|
||
Pierre Chrzanowski, Mattia Amadio, Stuart Fraser (GFDRR) | ||
Jen Harris (Open Data Services) | ||
|
||
**SC members:** | ||
- Paul Henshaw, GEM Foundation | ||
- Stephen Hutchings, JBA Risk Management | ||
- Nick Moody, IDF/GRMA | ||
|
||
**Absent** | ||
- Tiziana Rossetto, UCL EPICentre | ||
- Matt Donovan, ODS | ||
- Beat Aeberhardt, Swiss Re | ||
- Rachel Vint, Open Data Services | ||
|
||
**Others** | ||
Johanna Carter (ODS) | ||
Hamish Patten (IFRC) | ||
|
||
**Agenda** | ||
Updates to documentation and request for any feedback as you review (Stuart) | ||
Tools – Availability and use of the metadata creation and validation tool (Jen) | ||
Update on Fellowship projects and recent workshops (Pierre/Andy/Mattia) | ||
Communications plan for the RDLS (v0.2) – overview of blogs, webinar plans and channels for communications (Pierre). | ||
Request for update from Joh/Matt on Oasis integration of RDLS metadata (Joh/Matt) | ||
Others? | ||
|
||
Presentation | ||
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1UnudkTN0LqS9_gKT8mLaHxkZ8TxNgeVSYMJeZfVbYBY/edit#slide=id.g149d21ab14c_0_77 | ||
|
||
## Notes | ||
|
||
**Updates to documentation and request for any feedback as you review (Stuart)** | ||
|
||
|
||
Request for data documentation: PH: MWI data not his, but checking. GEM data is in the Db format - knew data commonly used by GEM would fit, but interested to see others - agriculture, etc. Suggest to make use of other data - interoperability of data where data is used by others, or produced by others - the value for GEM is not the use of RDLS internally - already document their data in internal formats. | ||
PC: We should communicate on GEM involvement in RDL project - how to keep up on their progress, and how pushing for adoption / adopting the standard. | ||
NM: Value is clear but what are forces and barriers to adoption. Is adoption clear in WB, or limited to GFDRR currently? PC: Strategy in WB is to go by different sectors, projects first - framework contract for risk assessment - pre-selected set of firms. TOR requests use of RDLS when sharing outputs. | ||
SF: how can we promote adoption in organisations. SH: TOR are a stick to drive takeup, but support from the RDL that eases the process would be v helpful. PH: Convertors are helpful. Oasis convertors would be helpful. Possible for exposure. More diff for Vuln. Talking about data. HP: modular is nice, each category is clear. IFRC - our data might be able to be converted into format but in some cases it can’t - loss&damage not in the same language. Specific contexts where its 1:1 from differetn standards, examples where there are exceptions where the standard may not align. SF: follow up on examples of misalignment with IFRC. | ||
PC: tooling component - SC could look at what is needed for development and adoption | ||
|
||
**Tools – Availability and use of the metadata creation and validation tool (Jen)**. | ||
JH: convertor demo. Highlighting errors, link to share metadata for 7 days. | ||
SH: can we capture (download the errors) | ||
JC: does the json file get generated with errors? - JH: - yes, with errors contained | ||
PH: Additional fields added? - JH: Will be added in JSON - present in the object/sheet where you added it in spreadsheet. PH: Is this what we want? Action - consider how to treat add. Fields | ||
CH: what is ultimate output - for NGOs, etc? Not the tool and validation of data. PC/SF: different levels of outputs - convertor tool is to help technical level of adoption. We will produce videos to promote at higher level - how the RDLS benefits operational projects e.g. on RDLS maximising impact of data generated [this is also the carrot for WB TTLs during internal meetings]. | ||
|
||
**Fellowship updates** | ||
AG: Have held several Fellow workshops including SF/MA / HP and own fellows, highlighting Zia and Isa project work. Will be promoting RDLS at Colombia Uni conference, and in WB - and during a week of WB meetings in DC. PC: Dedicated workshop at WB HQ - November 14th. To incl data sprint, in full week of activities. | ||
|
||
**Communications plan** | ||
From Oct 2nd (see presentation for full schedule) | ||
Request for any specific work done with RDLS to go into blog of organizations in first week of Oct. | ||
Invitation to present at the external webinar on work done. | ||
Video tutorials and high-level comms video | ||
Stakeholder mapping - need to add names, and create links with orgs. | ||
HP: Links with HDX - could create a bolt-on, ‘would you like to convert your data into RDLS’? - could be a driver of adoption. | ||
PC - yes - could provide a way to access exposure information. SF: Would want them to host RLDS metadata as first step | ||
HP: agrees but lots of data types on there - may throw up areas of misalignment. | ||
NM: Mapaction has a data scientist embedded in HDX - possible useful linkage? | ||
Carolina | ||
Would repost if SRF are tagged, wouldn’t have something on their website. | ||
Blog needs to promote benefits to end users - make it less WB focussed. How can each stakeholder use it. | ||
External webinars - already in 4 weeks - who is doing invitations | ||
Need to clarify more for Carolina | ||
Oct 10th is Swiss holiday | ||
Do we need different webinars for different audiences? Tech and high level | ||
PH: really useful to highlight different use cases with different messages. Should be clear that RDLS is bringing advantage to these communities. | ||
|
||
|
||
## Actions: | ||
Document what happens with additional fields | ||
Set up call with HDX | ||
Set up call with IFRC - loss and damage focus. | ||
Add high level video production into comms plan. Focus on communicating the benefits to sectors to drive adoption, not tools/validation level technical information. | ||
|
||
## Proposed agenda to include: | ||
Final planned SC meeting under Swiss Re Foundation funding | ||
Communications, take-up activities since September | ||
Plan for further SC involvement | ||
|
||
|