Mark the event as non optional for BulkRecordHook #727
Conversation
marcus-ff
changed the title
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces type signature changes in the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Handler
participant Plugin
participant Event
Plugin->>Handler: Invoke with record(s)
Plugin->>Handler: Mandatory event parameter
Handler->>Event: Process event details
Handler-->>Plugin: Return result
The sequence diagram illustrates the updated flow where the event parameter is now mandatory when invoking the handler functions, ensuring that event context is always provided during hook processing. Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.changeset/five-carrots-explain.md (1)
4-5: Enhance the changeset description.The current description could be more informative. Consider these improvements:
- Fix hyphenation: "non optional" → "non-optional"
- Add more context about the breaking change
- Include migration guidance
-Mark the event as non optional BulkRecordHook +Mark the event parameter as non-optional in BulkRecordHook + +BREAKING CHANGE: The `event` parameter in BulkRecordHook is now required. + +Migration Guide: +- Ensure all BulkRecordHook implementations provide the event parameter +- Remove any optional chaining operators (?) when accessing event properties🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~5-~5: This expression is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...ord-hook': major --- Mark the event as non optional BulkRecordHook(NON_ANTI_JJ)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.changeset/five-carrots-explain.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.changeset/five-carrots-explain.md
[grammar] ~5-~5: This expression is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...ord-hook': major --- Mark the event as non optional BulkRecordHook
(NON_ANTI_JJ)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.changeset/five-carrots-explain.md (1)
1-3: LGTM! Major version bump is appropriate.
The major version bump is correct since making the event parameter required is a breaking change.
This PR fixes the issue https://github.com/FlatFilers/configurator/issues/20
Please explain how to summarize this PR for the Changelog:
Remove the
?to make theeventparameter non optional atBulkRecordHookfunction since we always have this informationTell code reviewer how and what to test:
The project should work the same way as before