Change isValidNumber to isPossibleNumber #36
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve a modification to the phone number validation logic in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant PhoneUtil
participant ExternalConstraints
User->>ExternalConstraints: Submit phone number
ExternalConstraints->>PhoneUtil: Check if phone number is possible
PhoneUtil-->>ExternalConstraints: Return possibility status
ExternalConstraints-->>User: Return validation result
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/shared/externalContraints/externalConstraints.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/shared/externalContraints/externalConstraints.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-329: Consider reviewing related validators for consistencyWhile the change to
isPossibleNumberin thephonevalidator is the only modification in this file, it's worth considering if this change should be applied consistently across the project.To ensure consistency, please run the following script to check for any other uses of
isValidNumberin the project:If there are other occurrences, consider whether they should also be updated to
isPossibleNumberfor consistency, or if they have different requirements that justify keepingisValidNumber.✅ Verification successful
Verification Complete: No additional instances of
isValidNumberfound.The change to use
isPossibleNumberinexternalConstraints.tsis isolated and does not affect other parts of the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of isValidNumber in the project rg --type typescript 'phoneUtil\.isValidNumber'Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of isValidNumber in .ts and .tsx files rg 'phoneUtil\.isValidNumber' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 60
| @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ export const externalConstraints = { | |||
| if (value) { | |||
| try { | |||
| const phoneNumber = phoneUtil.parse(value, config.region); | |||
| if (!phoneUtil.isValidNumber(phoneNumber)) { | |||
| if (!phoneUtil.isPossibleNumber(phoneNumber)) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Validation logic changed from isValidNumber to isPossibleNumber
The change from isValidNumber to isPossibleNumber aligns with the PR objective. However, there are a few points to consider:
-
The error message "Invalid phone number" is now less accurate. Consider updating it to "Impossible phone number" or "Phone number doesn't meet basic format requirements" to reflect the new validation logic.
-
It would be helpful to add a comment explaining the rationale behind this change. For example:
// Using isPossibleNumber instead of isValidNumber to allow for a wider range of valid phone numbers // while still catching obviously incorrect formats.
-
Please consider the implications of this change:
- It will allow more phone numbers to pass validation, potentially including some that are formatted correctly but not actually in use.
- This might reduce false negatives (rejecting valid numbers) but could increase false positives (accepting invalid numbers).
Could you update the error message and add a comment explaining the change? Also, please confirm if this looser validation aligns with the project's requirements for phone number accuracy.
No description provided.