You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be great to be able to SORT (via context menu) a folder's bookmarks, either alphabetically or by most-recently-saved. In either case, the sub-folders would be alphabetically sorted at the top (or bottom, based on a general configuration preference setting).
As a further enhancement, allow sorting recursively (probably from the top level only). Special care may need to be taken to NOT re-arrange the bookmarks on the Chrome bookmark bar itself without confirming (or just don't provide the option because this gets people angry when it gets re-arranged, based on feedback for other plug-ins).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks a lot for your awesome suggestion. This project's been going for more than a decade, and with the little free time I've got, all I can do is make sure it keeps working smoothly with Chrome updates, without messing up your daily browsing. So, adding new features isn't on the agenda at the moment. Since bookmark data is shared between Chrome itself and other extensions, sticking to Chrome's built-in bookmark manager or using another extension that's really good at handling bookmarks would be the way to go.
It would be great to be able to SORT (via context menu) a folder's bookmarks, either alphabetically or by most-recently-saved. In either case, the sub-folders would be alphabetically sorted at the top (or bottom, based on a general configuration preference setting).
As a further enhancement, allow sorting recursively (probably from the top level only). Special care may need to be taken to NOT re-arrange the bookmarks on the Chrome bookmark bar itself without confirming (or just don't provide the option because this gets people angry when it gets re-arranged, based on feedback for other plug-ins).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: