You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At least for some cases, the progress indicator during a simulation gives strange results. More precisely, it never reaches the final "95%" mark and, instead:
This particular example was obtained with the following execution config file: start 0 stop 8 step_size 1 comm_timeout_ms 100000 step_timeout_multiplier 1000 instantiation_timeout_ms 60000
In this example, this behavior is experienced up a total simulation time of 20s (again, with step size 1s): start 0 stop 20 step_size 1
Scaling all the times by a factor of 0.1, however, causes the progress indicator to function as expected: start 0 stop 2 step_size 0.1
I suspect a minor error in the caclulation of the progress indicator.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For future reference, this is already registered in our old issue tracker as VIPROMA-118, with the following description:
[coralmaster] always prints its progress in increments of 5%. If the total number of time steps in a simulation is less than 20, this has the unfortunate consequence that 100% is never reached. The solution is to do something a bit more clever to the nextPerc variable in [src/master/main.cpp] than simply add 0.05 to it.
At least for some cases, the progress indicator during a simulation gives strange results. More precisely, it never reaches the final "95%" mark and, instead:
This particular example was obtained with the following execution config file:
start 0 stop 8 step_size 1 comm_timeout_ms 100000 step_timeout_multiplier 1000 instantiation_timeout_ms 60000
In this example, this behavior is experienced up a total simulation time of 20s (again, with step size 1s):
start 0 stop 20 step_size 1
Scaling all the times by a factor of 0.1, however, causes the progress indicator to function as expected:
start 0 stop 2 step_size 0.1
I suspect a minor error in the caclulation of the progress indicator.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: