Replies: 3 comments 12 replies
-
This is the info we currently display:It's marked with ? the info I couldn't confirm if we display or not. Would be great if someone could edit this comment and update the table if needed. If there's an item we cannot display, please mark with x.
More info we could display:I require confirmation whether we can display these items. Again, it would be great if someone could edit this comment and update the table. Mark ✓ for items we can display and x for items we cannot.
Please feel free to propose more items. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Here goes a proposal – let's focus on the information displayed and not on how it looks, as this is just a wireframe. At the top, we have the Reviews, Confinement, Version, and Download size. At the bottom, we have the Additional information section (we can call it something else) where we have: Publisher, Publication date, License, Category, Age rating, Installation date, Languages, Links, and Terms and conditions. I checked with @kenvandine, and we currently don't support languages and age rating, but this is something we would like to have in the future, so I am keeping it on the wireframes. I couldn't check if we can get all the items from Debs, so couldn't fill out the table above. Furthermore, I would like to know everyone's opinion on what should be at the top and bottom.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That's very nice! I also preferred those 4 infos over the big grid we have now Then for the many infos at the bottom this left alignment fits much better. Only the order of elements could be improved IMO. I think the Publisher should be in the upper 4-pieces section and the download size should be moved to the big section, as I thin kthis is a more important information to find "certified" apps |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I agree with @Feichtmeier the left align fits better at the bottom. Imo the infos organisation looks good like you did in your proposal @anasereijo
I had the same thought, but the publisher name is already shown below the app name, so it is really important to have this information twice in the top section (imo it is not necessary)? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
woops, didn't see this (name is so tiny) 🙈, okay I just do it like this then 👍 looks very good |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes! I think this perfect 👌 If a field is empty, we should have a message like "Not available". |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I noticed that in the wireframe above the publisher batch ✅ is placed in front of the name, but currently, in the app, it is placed behind the name - just as it is on snapcraft.io Are we allowed to move the batch before the name? Then we could solve this issue:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Bildschirmaufzeichnung.vom.14.03.2023.10.56.08.webm
There is a flutter issue with strings with spaces though, where spaces makes the string to be cut earlier that you like |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The solution is to replace white spaces with unbreakable ones: Like this flutter interprets this string as a single word. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Perfect! Thank you |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
omg this review in the screenshot 🤦 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
https://github.com/ubuntu-flutter-community/software/pull/1159 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
To keep things separat, we're moving the discussion from https://github.com/ubuntu-flutter-community/software/discussions/523
I think Apple does a nice job of minimizing the space (see here) and the Windows store has less information at the top, but then supply it with the "additional information" box further down the pages (like this).
Let's try a few mockups in this thread and see what works best 😃
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions