You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The provider at the moment doesn't allow to create additional disks to be attached to the provider. This means that only the images source using the image field can be used, and there is no way to attach your own storage as an additional volume.
Proposal
resource"virtualbox_disk""disk" {
name="primary_disk"format="VDI"capacity="80G"flexible=trueencrypted=false# the following will be the computed properties# location = "<base_location>/primary_disk.vdi" # Maybe this will be customisable# uuid = "<computed>"
}
The disk would be then attached to a virtualbox_storage_controller and the storage controller would be attached to the vm itself.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am wondering about the consistency in the naming. If its attached to virtualbox_storage_controller, should this resource be called virtualbox_storage?
The provider at the moment doesn't allow to create additional disks to be attached to the provider. This means that only the images source using the
image
field can be used, and there is no way to attach your own storage as an additional volume.Proposal
The disk would be then attached to a
virtualbox_storage_controller
and the storage controller would be attached to the vm itself.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: