Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Y24-460 - Confirm and update fragment sizes for WGS Branch - Automated Submission #2073

Closed
2 tasks
Tracked by #4199
StephenHulme opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed
2 tasks
Tracked by #4199
Assignees
Labels
EMSeq ToR 170 Size: S Small - low effort & risk

Comments

@StephenHulme
Copy link
Contributor

Description
The WGS Branch - Automated Submission created in #1982 requires fragment_size_required_from and fragment_size_required_to to be set to appropriate values - the current ones are copy-pasted from another submission and can be considered incorrect.

Acceptance Criteria
The following outputs from the research are produced:

  • The correct values are discovered
  • The values for fragment_size_required_from and fragment_size_required_to are replaced with the correct values
    • See:
      # config/purposes/lcm_triomics.wip.yml
      
      LCMT DNA Adp Lig:
       :submission_options:
         WGS Branch - Automated Submission:
           request_options:
      

Who the primary contacts are for this work

Knowledge or Stake holders

  • Scott T

Additional context or information
Any other useful context or information that may be useful.

@psd-issuer psd-issuer bot changed the title Confirm and update fragment sizes for WGS Branch - Automated Submission Y24-460 - Confirm and update fragment sizes for WGS Branch - Automated Submission Nov 18, 2024
@StephenHulme StephenHulme added the EMSeq ToR 170 label Nov 18, 2024
@StephenHulme
Copy link
Contributor Author

Putting this into Todo since it is a component of the already prioritised sanger/sequencescape#4199 - please feel free to re-prioritise.

@StephenHulme StephenHulme added the Size: S Small - low effort & risk label Nov 18, 2024
@yoldas
Copy link
Member

yoldas commented Dec 2, 2024

Question: what would be the correct request options for the WGS branch automated submission?

We have used the following configuration for the WGS Branch - Automated Submission for testing:
Template Name: Limber-Htp - LCM Triomics WGS
Request Options:
Library Type: LCM Triomics WGS
Fragment size required (from): 200
Fragment size required (to): 800
PCR Cycles: Not specified

The answer received by email (27 November)

"For the WGS libraries that have recently been submitted for sequencing after manual EMseq library preparation they have been using:
o Library Type: LCMB
o Fragment size required (from): 450
o Fragment size required (to): 450
However please let me confirm this with the SSRs, because using 450 for both the to & from library sizes is not what I was expecting to see."

@yoldas yoldas added the On Hold On hold label Dec 11, 2024
@KatyTaylor
Copy link
Contributor

Update: this is 'on hold' because we're waiting for confirmation as to what the fragment sizes should be.

@yoldas yoldas self-assigned this Jan 9, 2025
@TWJW-SANGER TWJW-SANGER removed the On Hold On hold label Jan 9, 2025
@TWJW-SANGER
Copy link

Moving to done.
The pipeline has been implemented with fragment sizes originally specified the only question is if these are correct.
Should they need to change we will change them but given the lack of response we can unwip the pipeline and remind the stakeholder that these values are somewhat suspect.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
EMSeq ToR 170 Size: S Small - low effort & risk
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants