Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Y24-090 Donor pooling - only one source plate #1706

Open
2 tasks
KatyTaylor opened this issue May 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
2 tasks

Y24-090 Donor pooling - only one source plate #1706

KatyTaylor opened this issue May 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request scRNA - cDNA prep scRNA Should've MoSCoW Prioritization - Should Have Capability/Feature Size: S Small - low effort & risk

Comments

@KatyTaylor
Copy link
Contributor

KatyTaylor commented May 20, 2024

User story
As a user of the scRNA Core pipeline, I would like the donor pooling step (into the LRC PBMC Pools plate) to allow only one source plate.

This change is due to the decision being taken to use the GEM-X chip rather than the HT chip, which has fewer wells (and therefore fewer pools on this upstream plate).

Who are the primary contacts for this story
Katy, Abdullah, Abby

Who is the nominated tester for UAT
Abby

Acceptance criteria
To be considered successful the solution must allow:

  • There is no interstitial page when creating the LRC PBMC Pools plate - the user does not have to scan in the source plates.
  • Put a comment in a relevant place in the code to mitigate against losing the work that we are removing here - e.g. pointing to a git commit where the page is present - because it's possible we may want to reinstate the page in future (Cardinal project main phase).
@KatyTaylor KatyTaylor added scRNA scRNA - cDNA prep Size: S Small - low effort & risk labels May 20, 2024
@KatyTaylor KatyTaylor changed the title Y24-nnn Donor pooling - only one source plate Y24-090 Donor pooling - only one source plate May 20, 2024
@KatyTaylor
Copy link
Contributor Author

Put on hold due to this from Abby in Slack:

Hi, please could I also just ask you to hold off on [this story]
The reason for this is that I need to check with Lesley when she's back but yesterday it was mentioned that Cardinal may want to pool 2 plates together to then load on the GEM-X chips so I wouldn't want you to remove already built in functionality needlessly.

@KatyTaylor KatyTaylor added On Hold On hold and removed On Hold On hold labels Jun 17, 2024
@KatyTaylor
Copy link
Contributor Author

Removed the on hold label - decision documented here - #1377 (comment)

@SujitDey2022 SujitDey2022 added the Enhancement New feature or request label Jul 4, 2024
@SujitDey2022 SujitDey2022 added the Should've MoSCoW Prioritization - Should Have Capability/Feature label Jul 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request scRNA - cDNA prep scRNA Should've MoSCoW Prioritization - Should Have Capability/Feature Size: S Small - low effort & risk
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants