We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Way #468835963 for example:
Version 1: bikepathmapper created this object. There is really only 1 version of this object. It incorporates the existing node 1520555327.
bikepathmapper
{"type":"Feature","properties":{"@version":1,"@minorVersion":0,"@user":"bikepathmapper","@changeset":45488198,"@uid":141444,"@validSince":1485373766,"@validUntil":1322450131,"aA":{"foot":"yes","highway":"cycleway"}},"geometry":{"type":"LineString","coordinates":[[-77.0427935,39.0283537],[-77.0428529,39.0283619]]}}
Currently, OSM-Wayback creates this (impossible) minor version, using the first coordinates (and initial creation) of node 1520555327.
{"type":"Feature","properties":{"@version":1,"@minorVersion":1,"@user":"ecaldwell","@uid":86027,"@validSince":1322450131,"@validUntil":null},"geometry":{"type":"LineString","coordinates":[[-77.0427935,39.0283537],[-77.0428529,39.0283619]]}}
This minor version is (1) not real, and (2) the geometry associated with the original object is apparently also wrong.
... This is a problem in the current geometry reconstruction (should create a unit test-case for this)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jenningsanderson
No branches or pull requests
Way #468835963 for example:
Version 1:
bikepathmapper
created this object. There is really only 1 version of this object. It incorporates the existing node 1520555327.Currently, OSM-Wayback creates this (impossible) minor version, using the first coordinates (and initial creation) of node 1520555327.
This minor version is (1) not real, and (2) the geometry associated with the original object is apparently also wrong.
... This is a problem in the current geometry reconstruction (should create a unit test-case for this)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: