We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This way we don't have the artificial non-specific clade "recombinant"
For example, XBB is derived from 21L and 22D - 22D derives from 21L, so XBB should be 21L, and attach at 21L, or a more recent common ancestor.
Importantly, the branch length to recombinants needs to be long, so that the ancestral reconstruction is not misled.
It would be nice if it was possible to visually indicate recombinants in Auspice, e.g. by having dashed line instead of full line.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
This way we don't have the artificial non-specific clade "recombinant"
For example, XBB is derived from 21L and 22D - 22D derives from 21L, so XBB should be 21L, and attach at 21L, or a more recent common ancestor.
Importantly, the branch length to recombinants needs to be long, so that the ancestral reconstruction is not misled.
It would be nice if it was possible to visually indicate recombinants in Auspice, e.g. by having dashed line instead of full line.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: