You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Every mobile app tells a story through data - each user interaction, performance metric, and crash report reveals crucial insights about the application's health. But here's the challenge: these stories are scattered across a maze of tools, creating expensive blind spots that make incident resolution painfully slow.
Take a moment to count the tools your team uses to figure out the root cause of an issue. If you're like most mobile teams, your list might include tools for:
User Experience: experience monitoring, product analytics
Debugging: crash reporting, remote logging
Issue Tracking: bug reporting, customer support
Each tool excels at its specific task, but together they create a fragmented view of your app's reality. When issues arise, developers become digital archaeologists, piecing together clues from these disconnected sources:
"What sequence of events led to this crash?"
"Why can't we reproduce this bug that users keep reporting?"
"How was the app performing on this specific device before the issue occurred?"
Imagine trying to solve a puzzle where pieces are spread across different rooms – that's the daily challenge mobile teams face when debugging issues or optimizing performance. The answers exist, but they're trapped in silos across different tools.
The hidden costs you're already paying
1. The time and context trap
When a critical bug surfaces, your team doesn't just debug code – they become detectives. Developers navigate between disconnected tools, trying to piece together what happened: crash reports in one system, user sessions in another, and logs scattered elsewhere. A bug that should take hours to resolve stretches into days as developers spend more time investigating than fixing. Without unified context, they can't see the full picture: What was the user doing before the crash? How was the app performing? What other errors occurred? This fragmented view forces teams to make educated guesses and apply band-aid fixes rather than solve root causes.
2. The cost multiplier
The true cost of fragmented monitoring goes far beyond multiple subscription fees. The developers are maintaining multiple SDKs, managing separate configurations, and juggling different APIs – complexity that ripples through your entire development process. Add to this the costs of:
time needed to understand each tool
redundant data storage across systems
integration maintenance and updates
context-switching overhead
This adds huge cognitive load that could be spent building new features.
3. The trust and reputation impact
When users report issues, they expect swift, comprehensive solutions. Instead, fragmented monitoring forces teams to respond with vague answers like "We'll look into it" or "Could you provide more details?" Each inconclusive response erodes user trust and damages your app's reputation. More critically, this fractured view of app performance means teams often miss emerging issues until they've already affected multiple users. The result? A reactive rather than proactive approach to app quality, leading to frustrated users and increased churn.
Making a shift
The solution isn't adding more tools – it's unifying your monitoring strategy. Here's how to start:
1. Map essential debug data
Review recent incidents to identify what you need for effective debugging:
User flows, sessions, and context
Device states and performance metrics
System logs and error traces
Business context (user segments, feature flags)
2. Review current coverage
Examine your monitoring setup:
Find overlapping data collection
Identify critical blind spots
Evaluate time spent correlating data
3. Choose your path
Pick an approach that's suitable for your scenario:
Use Firebase SDK for Google Analytics to automatically get breadcrumb logs - these logs give you visibility into user actions leading up to a Crashlytics-collected event in your app.
Build internal dashboards by connecting together data from various tools. You can use BI tools like- Metabase, Looker Studio etc.
Buy a tool which fits your requirement and budget- search Crashlytics alternatives
Adopt open-source tools like Measure; it captures all the necessary signals to correlate issues, considering what the user was doing, how the device was behaving, and the app's state, which enables developers to pinpoint the root cause more efficiently. It can be self-hosted and has Apache 2.0 license.
session.webm
The way forward
Your monitoring tool should connect user actions to performance data, track issues end-to-end, and help predict problems early. Start with your most painful debugging scenarios and scale based on your needs. Your users expect excellence, and your team deserves tools that help deliver it.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Every mobile app tells a story through data - each user interaction, performance metric, and crash report reveals crucial insights about the application's health. But here's the challenge: these stories are scattered across a maze of tools, creating expensive blind spots that make incident resolution painfully slow.
Take a moment to count the tools your team uses to figure out the root cause of an issue. If you're like most mobile teams, your list might include tools for:
Each tool excels at its specific task, but together they create a fragmented view of your app's reality. When issues arise, developers become digital archaeologists, piecing together clues from these disconnected sources:
Imagine trying to solve a puzzle where pieces are spread across different rooms – that's the daily challenge mobile teams face when debugging issues or optimizing performance. The answers exist, but they're trapped in silos across different tools.
The hidden costs you're already paying
1. The time and context trap
When a critical bug surfaces, your team doesn't just debug code – they become detectives. Developers navigate between disconnected tools, trying to piece together what happened: crash reports in one system, user sessions in another, and logs scattered elsewhere. A bug that should take hours to resolve stretches into days as developers spend more time investigating than fixing. Without unified context, they can't see the full picture: What was the user doing before the crash? How was the app performing? What other errors occurred? This fragmented view forces teams to make educated guesses and apply band-aid fixes rather than solve root causes.
2. The cost multiplier
The true cost of fragmented monitoring goes far beyond multiple subscription fees. The developers are maintaining multiple SDKs, managing separate configurations, and juggling different APIs – complexity that ripples through your entire development process. Add to this the costs of:
This adds huge cognitive load that could be spent building new features.
3. The trust and reputation impact
When users report issues, they expect swift, comprehensive solutions. Instead, fragmented monitoring forces teams to respond with vague answers like "We'll look into it" or "Could you provide more details?" Each inconclusive response erodes user trust and damages your app's reputation. More critically, this fractured view of app performance means teams often miss emerging issues until they've already affected multiple users. The result? A reactive rather than proactive approach to app quality, leading to frustrated users and increased churn.
Making a shift
The solution isn't adding more tools – it's unifying your monitoring strategy. Here's how to start:
1. Map essential debug data
Review recent incidents to identify what you need for effective debugging:
2. Review current coverage
Examine your monitoring setup:
3. Choose your path
Pick an approach that's suitable for your scenario:
session.webm
The way forward
Your monitoring tool should connect user actions to performance data, track issues end-to-end, and help predict problems early. Start with your most painful debugging scenarios and scale based on your needs. Your users expect excellence, and your team deserves tools that help deliver it.
⭐ Check out Measure and star it for updates!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions