From de080a5f87d5c37b01758bdc22843c033672a668 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Grifski <jeremy.grifski@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:29:28 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Moved initial prototype to subsection

---
 docs/report/report.tex | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/report/report.tex b/docs/report/report.tex
index cd55079..803af16 100644
--- a/docs/report/report.tex
+++ b/docs/report/report.tex
@@ -249,8 +249,6 @@ \section{Tasks and Metrics}
 professional reviewers to see how their thoughts vary from the results in the
 tool.
 
-\section{Initial Prototype}
-
 \section{Evaluation}
 
 Evaluation was done in two phases, an initial prototype on March 7, 2019 and an
@@ -261,6 +259,8 @@ \section{Evaluation}
 Unfortunately, they hadn’t gotten around to the tool in time due to vis paper
 deadlines. As a result, we decided to review the tool ourselves.
 
+\subsection{Initial Prototype}
+
 \subsection{Prototype Feedback}
 
 In general, feedback was positive. However, there were a few things