From 4518b97c5bd421dd1ca037532be15dd85aea9cf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Widder <44643235+josef-widder@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:10:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update specs/quint/specs/reset/README.md Co-authored-by: Daniel --- specs/quint/specs/reset/README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/specs/quint/specs/reset/README.md b/specs/quint/specs/reset/README.md index 854de33d3..bc324a4eb 100644 --- a/specs/quint/specs/reset/README.md +++ b/specs/quint/specs/reset/README.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ We used `quint run` to conduct random simulation, and checked that the invariant - `noStaleWithProofInv`: If a valid proof was verified on L1, then there should be no unfulfilled updates - `provenHeightMonotonic`: latest L2 proven height in L1 blocks is non-decreasing - `L1ForkIDMonotonic`: L2 forkID in L1 blocks is non-decreasing - - `InvalidRegistrationProofRejectedInv`: If there is no (valid) proof or the proof contains an invalid registration, then the proof should be rejected, by checking that provenHeight remains unchanged (checked also for `--step "stepWithInvalidRegs"`) + - `InvalidRegistrationProofRejectedInv`: If the latest block in L1 does not include a (valid) proof or the proof contains an invalid registration, then the proof should be rejected. We check that by attesting that L1's provenHeight remains unchanged (checked also for `--step "stepWithInvalidRegs"`) - `OldProofRejectedInv`: If the proof starts from a block smaller than provenHeight it is rejected. (checked also with step `stepWithPotentiallyOldProofs`) - `FutureProofRejectedInv`: If the proof starts from a block with height greater than provenHeight + 1 it is rejected. (checked also with step `stepWithPotentiallyFutureProofs`)