From 32847cc79e6cf0bbfc2feb3ff5de5fa36dd90149 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Widder <44643235+josef-widder@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:12:31 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update specs/quint/specs/reset/README.md Co-authored-by: Daniel --- specs/quint/specs/reset/README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/specs/quint/specs/reset/README.md b/specs/quint/specs/reset/README.md index bc324a4eb..8b3b12253 100644 --- a/specs/quint/specs/reset/README.md +++ b/specs/quint/specs/reset/README.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ We used `quint run` to conduct random simulation, and checked that the invariant - `provenHeightMonotonic`: latest L2 proven height in L1 blocks is non-decreasing - `L1ForkIDMonotonic`: L2 forkID in L1 blocks is non-decreasing - `InvalidRegistrationProofRejectedInv`: If the latest block in L1 does not include a (valid) proof or the proof contains an invalid registration, then the proof should be rejected. We check that by attesting that L1's provenHeight remains unchanged (checked also for `--step "stepWithInvalidRegs"`) - - `OldProofRejectedInv`: If the proof starts from a block smaller than provenHeight it is rejected. (checked also with step `stepWithPotentiallyOldProofs`) + - `OldProofRejectedInv`: L1 blocks should not accept proofs with non monotonically increasing proven L2 heights. As a consequence, the latest L2 proven height in L1 should remain unchanged with such a proof is submitted (checked also with `--step stepWithPotentiallyOldProofs`) - `FutureProofRejectedInv`: If the proof starts from a block with height greater than provenHeight + 1 it is rejected. (checked also with step `stepWithPotentiallyFutureProofs`) - Local L2 invariants