Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test Results on Different Glove Embeddings - For Interest #11

Open
kpoots opened this issue Sep 25, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Test Results on Different Glove Embeddings - For Interest #11

kpoots opened this issue Sep 25, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@kpoots
Copy link

kpoots commented Sep 25, 2020

I generated my own Glove embeddings, but restricted those embeddings to only be what is in my dataset vocabulary. The results were worse it seems, although I did get something for queries which previously didn't have any results.

It seems that using an off-the-shelf collection of Glove embeddings - effectively - adds to the vocabulary of the queries. This means that Glove expansion is somewhat dependent on the collection of Glove embeddings - where it came from. This is interesting. Might lead to a variation on expanders. If you find a giant collection of Glove embeddings, the results could improve.

Ok, I can dream of electric sheep https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Androids_Dream_of_Electric_Sheep%3F . And giant collections of Glove embeddings.

Sorry its late, and I'm tired, but I am trying.

@hosseinfani hosseinfani changed the title Test Results - For Interest Test Results on Different Glove Embeddings - For Interest Sep 25, 2020
@hosseinfani hosseinfani added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Oct 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants