You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I generated my own Glove embeddings, but restricted those embeddings to only be what is in my dataset vocabulary. The results were worse it seems, although I did get something for queries which previously didn't have any results.
It seems that using an off-the-shelf collection of Glove embeddings - effectively - adds to the vocabulary of the queries. This means that Glove expansion is somewhat dependent on the collection of Glove embeddings - where it came from. This is interesting. Might lead to a variation on expanders. If you find a giant collection of Glove embeddings, the results could improve.
I generated my own Glove embeddings, but restricted those embeddings to only be what is in my dataset vocabulary. The results were worse it seems, although I did get something for queries which previously didn't have any results.
It seems that using an off-the-shelf collection of Glove embeddings - effectively - adds to the vocabulary of the queries. This means that Glove expansion is somewhat dependent on the collection of Glove embeddings - where it came from. This is interesting. Might lead to a variation on expanders. If you find a giant collection of Glove embeddings, the results could improve.
Ok, I can dream of electric sheep https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Androids_Dream_of_Electric_Sheep%3F . And giant collections of Glove embeddings.
Sorry its late, and I'm tired, but I am trying.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: