-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Form Data Extraction (Walter Wellauer) #156
Comments
We can add Definition based extraction as another possibility. Definition based extraction creates always a transaction (Definition-based will always produce a 'transaction' Bundle that indicates what resources are to be created or updated. The resources within the transaction can be anything (including Bundle resources such as FHIR documents)). I'm not aware of any tooling supporting the defintion-based-exctraction which would create a document bundle with links in between the ressources, will ask non zulip for that. |
There seems to be not an obvious solution to link the extracted resources together: https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/179255-questionnaire/topic/Definition-based.20extraction.20with.20multiple.20resources |
added my question to above zulip thread |
there seems to be no tooling or example availabe supporting definition-based extraction for creating a document bundle (the one answer in above zulip thread is not the sdc definition based extraction approach). @walterwellauer do you have any other information/input how this approach could work? |
ch.fhir.ig.ch-orf#2.0.0-ballot /form-data-extraction.html
Deifinition based extraction support should also be considered to be expicitly supported as is would bei helpful at the form receiver actor side. According to http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/STU3/extraction.html#definition-based-extraction there are some additional requirements to support that.
Walter Wellauer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: