Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add trait: GDPR compliance #14

Open
fabianekc opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Add trait: GDPR compliance #14

fabianekc opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@fabianekc
Copy link

In some use cases it is relevant to ensure GDPR compliance for the identifiers used. Therefore, I propose to discuss if this trait makes sense and might be added.

@jceb
Copy link
Contributor

jceb commented Nov 26, 2024

@fabianekc are there specific features that make a DID method GDPR compliant? The right to be forgotten comes to mind.

@jceb
Copy link
Contributor

jceb commented Nov 26, 2024

Example definition:

{
    "gdpr-compliant": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "title": "GDPR-compliant",
      "description": "A DID method's ability to fully adhere to the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requirements, ensuring comprehensive protection of personal data and individual privacy rights."
    }
}

jceb added a commit to jceb/did-traits that referenced this issue Nov 26, 2024
- cryptography_privacy_preserving: decentralized-identity#16
- cryptography_government-approved: decentralized-identity#15
- gdpr-compliant: decentralized-identity#14
@jceb jceb added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 26, 2024
@jceb
Copy link
Contributor

jceb commented Dec 10, 2024

The trait has been added. It's up to the method author to provide detailed information on the compliance.

@jceb jceb closed this as completed Dec 10, 2024
@jceb
Copy link
Contributor

jceb commented Jan 7, 2025

In today's call, we concluded that this trait is too difficult to express in a simple boolean value and not technical enough. Therefore, the trait will be removed.

@jceb jceb reopened this Jan 7, 2025
@ottomorac
Copy link
Contributor

Yes agreed. As we discussed compliance with data protection can even be altered depending in how the did method is implemented in specific instance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants