Which DID Methods are primarily funded by, will be controlled by, or primarily to the benefit of the US Government (US military complex, DHS, FBI, CIA, CBP, immigration, etc.)?

[mwherman2000]

Which DID Methods are primarily funded by, will be controlled by, or primarily to the benefit of the US Government (US military complex, DHS, FBI, CIA, CBP, immigration, etc.)?

@peacekeeper @kimdhamilton

[ottomorac]

Hello. This is perhaps a duplicate of this other issue: #17

[brianorwhatever]

I also don't think this is of particular relevance. This group should be focused on technical merit and other more relevant criteria -- not funding mechanisms.

[mwherman2000]

For example, if there is a DID Method that is very specific to, for example, DHS/CBP with little to no imagined reusability, it's priority IMO should be ranked quite low.

Universal DID Methods on the other hand should be ranked quite high (within their cluster).

[brianorwhatever]

yes, they should be. Not because of where the money that funded them came from but because a universal DID method is more generally useful as a DID method.