You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the only way for the OLD to handle an infix is to treat it as a regular affix, i.e., a suffix or prefix. Then the morphological parsers could be used to construct a phonology that handles the surface manifestation of that affix.
However, the OLD would not currently be able to parse something like the above, i.e., it would not be able to recognize "bili" glossed as "buy" as a morpheme and "um" glossed as "ACTFOC" as another and create links to their lexical entries. However, this is something that the OLD should support.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the only way for the OLD to handle an infix is to treat it as a regular affix, i.e., a suffix or prefix. Then the morphological parsers could be used to construct a phonology that handles the surface manifestation of that affix.
However, given the Leipzig glossing rules, angle brackets are used:
However, the OLD would not currently be able to parse something like the above, i.e., it would not be able to recognize "bili" glossed as "buy" as a morpheme and "um" glossed as "ACTFOC" as another and create links to their lexical entries. However, this is something that the OLD should support.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: