summary should include analytics like contributes info and commits history

[mxbilal]

No description provided.

[cyclotruc]

It's a good idea thank you!

I'm all up for this but I would prefer if we found a way to do it without using the Github API first, solely basing the analytics on things that can be found in .git

Using the github API/ abstractions will be possible once github login is properly implemented

[mxbilal]

alright thene you can show some packages detail info for instance this project will run on higher node version then 18 or something and also libraries that are famous are used . more over integration of gitlab and bitbucket to read them too would make it more awsome

[gowthamkishore3799]

Ideally, the .git directory contains valuable information about commits, refs, configs, etc., with the total number of commits being particularly useful. However, the challenge arises because we clone the repository using --depth=1, which only retrieves the most recent commit.

To avoid this, either we have to take down the --depth option or wait for github integration

[cyclotruc]

dropping the --depth option is definitly doable if limited to some complex queries, the depth at 1 is just a good default for the most comon usecases where we don't need all the history