You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I understand that r3 uses a prefix tree to implement the matching of the routes. When I add two routes "/test" and "/test2", I can also match "/test3". That is because "/test" is a prefix of "/test3", correct?
Is that intended behaviour? How can I recognize that in my implementation of the routing? Or is it just that we don't care as long as our routing starts correctly what follows after that correct route?
Thanks for the great library!
Sebastian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I understand that r3 uses a prefix tree to implement the matching of the
routes. When I add two routes "/test" and "/test2", I can also match
"/test3". That is because "/test" is a prefix of "/test3", correct?
Is that intended behaviour? How can I recognize that in my implementation
of the routing? Or is it just that we don't care as long as our routing
starts correctly what follows after that correct route?
Thanks for the great library!
Sebastian
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#117>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADGzhwQs6q5xJfYx_oCQvIPg7rKxivHks5uocMOgaJpZM4X6VnN>
.
Hi,
I understand that r3 uses a prefix tree to implement the matching of the routes. When I add two routes "/test" and "/test2", I can also match "/test3". That is because "/test" is a prefix of "/test3", correct?
Is that intended behaviour? How can I recognize that in my implementation of the routing? Or is it just that we don't care as long as our routing starts correctly what follows after that correct route?
Thanks for the great library!
Sebastian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: