Reactive Stores Comparison for Angular #1
Alexander-Zmanovsky
announced in
Comparisons
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In this comparison, I'll explore three different reactive store implementations for Angular:
Bitfiber Reactive Store
,RxJS Subjects Store
, andNgRx Signal Store
.We’ll focus on each solution’s unique strengths and limitations, examining their approaches to
state management, the amount of boilerplate required, and how seamlessly they integrate with
Angular’s reactive programming model.
Table of Contents
Objectives
Common types
Component Using Store
Bitfiber Reactive Store
RxJs Subjects Store
NgRx Signal Store
Conclusion
Objectives
Each store implementation will be evaluated based on its ability to accomplish the following tasks:
Load two dictionaries in parallel when the store starts.
The store must initiate parallel loading of two dictionaries, ensuring both are ready before
moving to the next step.
Load products after dictionaries are fully loaded.
Once the dictionaries have successfully loaded, the store will initiate loading of products.
This ensures that products are loaded in the context of available dictionary data.
Reload products each time the filters change.
The store should reactively reload products based on any filter changes, ensuring that product
data remains relevant to the latest filter criteria.
Common types
Component Using Store
Bitfiber Reactive Store
RxJs Subjects Store
NgRx Signal Store
Conclusion
Bitfiber Reactive Store:
Pros:
and observables traceable.
as well as use of RxJS operators.
RxJS Subjects Store:
Pros:
Cons:
NgRx Signal Store:
Pros:
Cons:
require async task dependencies or sequencing.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions