Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UX improvements #37

Open
Trass3r opened this issue Sep 30, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

UX improvements #37

Trass3r opened this issue Sep 30, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Trass3r
Copy link
Contributor

Trass3r commented Sep 30, 2022

Tried the standalone app on a big project. Very nice tool!
A few small things I noticed:

  • By default the horizontal space isn't fully used. I always have to manually widen the Name tab.
  • In the include graph the hover popup just shows the filename, which is redundant if it's already visible. It should (maybe in addition) show the full path. (A similar popup would be useful in other places like Units when you have several CUs with the same filename.)
  • Imho the default sorting order should be Duration/Accumulated descending, as this is probably the most useful metric to find the places to start optimizing.
  • Table sorting performance could be better, Optimize Function has 1 million entries and takes a while to sort. If you click multiple times the app is rather unusable for a while until it catches up.
  • In Parse Template the top entry is <unknown>, not sure what to make of that. When I look at the max json file it seems fine.
  • It shows total build time as around 3 minutes while the build actually took like 20. Not sure where that number comes from. The aggregated cost of multiple hours of cpu time seems about right otoh.
  • Can't copy a whole row of a table.
@Viladoman Viladoman added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants